Moose 4.9 and tests
Locked
 
|
Hello,
There are several tests failing in Moose 4.9. Majority of them are related to OSProcess and some others are related to Moose and Roassal. We have Pharo sprint next week so, here in Lille, we can work on making unstable builds on the moose jenkins green (Moose 4.9, Moose-algos, and Moose-on-the-web). Because, it will be difficult for us to move the downstream projects to Moose 4.9 unless the build is stable.
It would be good to know the roadmap to move to Pharo 3.0 because the major change between Moose 4.8 and Moose 4.9 is removing Mondrian. So when do we move to Pharo 3.0? regards, Usman _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Moose is actually not unstable at all, but the tests did look bad. - remove OSProcess from the executed tests
- remove references to Mondrian which is why most of the other tests failed - fixed one Roassal test by adding a dummy ROGraphvizLayout>>doExecute: (note that the graphviz layout is only loaded in the moose image, not directly from Roassal).
Now, we only get 2 tests failing: - Still a Roassal test related to the Steping behavior of the Graphviz layout. I do not quite understand how to fix this one.
- a Monticello importer test. It would be great if anyone could look into these two. Cheers, Doru On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Usman Bhatti <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
As soon as the tests are green, and we fix the ugly tiny bug with the splitters in tables (http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=985), we release 4.9 and move to Moose 5.0 on Pharo 3.0. I think this can happen in a few days if we work on it. Doru On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
"Every thing has its own flow"
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
> Now, we only get 2 tests failing:
> - Still a Roassal test related to the Steping behavior of the Graphviz layout. I do not quite understand how to fix this one. I fixed it. A bit hackish, but okay in my opinion. > - a Monticello importer test. I had a look at it but I could not understand what is wrong. Apparently a class is not looked up probably. Maybe we could do a screensharing to pair program... Cheers, Alexandre > > It would be great if anyone could look into these two. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Usman Bhatti <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello, > > There are several tests failing in Moose 4.9. Majority of them are related to OSProcess and some others are related to Moose and Roassal. We have Pharo sprint next week so, here in Lille, we can work on making unstable builds on the moose jenkins green (Moose 4.9, Moose-algos, and Moose-on-the-web). Because, it will be difficult for us to move the downstream projects to Moose 4.9 unless the build is stable. > > It would be good to know the roadmap to move to Pharo 3.0 because the major change between Moose 4.8 and Moose 4.9 is removing Mondrian. So when do we move to Pharo 3.0? > > > regards, > > Usman > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tudor Girba-2
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Tudor Girba <[hidden email]> wrote:
I committed a correction for this failing test. Now the test is green and so is the build. Usman
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by abergel
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
Tx Alex.
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
In reply to this post by Usman Bhatti
Le 12 oct. 2013 à 21:27, Usman Bhatti a écrit :
Can you please explain what you have modified or check on Orion and certainly also on Moose Thanks in advance. Anne
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Anne Etien <[hidden email]> wrote:
The Orion job was failing because moose-latest-dev-4.8 job was renamed to moose-latest-dev-4.9 after the release of 4.8. Since Orion and other non-updated projects were pointing to the older, now non-existing job, thus these were failing. I updated all the failing job to point to the renamed job and now these are green.
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
|
|
Thanks, a lot.
Anne Le 13 oct. 2013 à 13:22, Usman Bhatti a écrit :
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
«
Return to Moose
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |