More on Pollock rant

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

More on Pollock rant

Rich Demers
Boris,
 
Thanks for the reference. Of course adding three more people can't hurt, but the real need appears to be for two or three (or more) times the current staffing (still not a Mongolian Hoard). 
 
A confession: I worked for many years in a large, well managed software lab where a thousand people were productively used to produce new and enhanced software on a rigid schedule according to a well-defined process.  This is a different development model and perhaps not adapted to a star programmer environment, but I can't help but wonder if some of it wouldn't be useful.
 
Rich 
 
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: More on Pollock rant

Samuel S. Shuster <sames@interaccess.com>
Rich,

> Of course adding three more people can't hurt,

Also note: Only one of these is for Engineering.

                                 And So It Goes
                                      Sames
______________________________________________________________________

Samuel S. Shuster [|]
VisualWorks Engineering, GUI Project
Smalltalk Enables Success -- What Are YOU Using?