MorphTreeMorph

> On 07.09.2009, at 20:10, Tudor Girba wrote:
>
>  
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like in the latest Pharo images (both core and dev) the
>> MorphTreeMorph class is missing. In fact, it looks like the whole
>> System-Settings package is missing.
>>
>> Is there a reason for this?
>>
>>    
>
> Hello,
>
> The settings were not used and the next version seemingly will change  
> form an
> API perspective.
>
> Of course, I did not know that the package contained widgets that are  
> used by
> others...
>
> Maybe we can move the  MorphTreeMorph class into the package that  
> contains the
> widgets?
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>
> --
> Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de
> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
>  

> Hil all,
>
> MorphTreeMorph and related are still not mature enough to be  
> considered
> as part of standard widgets. This is why it is private to the settings
> package.
> For 1.0, I think it is better to not integrate it
> Cheers
> Alain
>
> Marcus Denker a écrit :
>> On 07.09.2009, at 20:10, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It looks like in the latest Pharo images (both core and dev) the
>>> MorphTreeMorph class is missing. In fact, it looks like the whole
>>> System-Settings package is missing.
>>>
>>> Is there a reason for this?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The settings were not used and the next version seemingly will change
>> form an
>> API perspective.
>>
>> Of course, I did not know that the package contained widgets that are
>> used by
>> others...
>>
>> Maybe we can move the  MorphTreeMorph class into the package that
>> contains the
>> widgets?
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de
>> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>

> Aha, thanks for the clarification. In this case, I will just work with
> it by loading it from Monticello :).
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 8 Sep 2009, at 08:48, Alain Plantec wrote:
>
>> Hil all,
>>
>> MorphTreeMorph and related are still not mature enough to be
>> considered
>> as part of standard widgets. This is why it is private to the  
>> settings
>> package.
>> For 1.0, I think it is better to not integrate it
>> Cheers
>> Alain
>>
>> Marcus Denker a écrit :
>>> On 07.09.2009, at 20:10, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like in the latest Pharo images (both core and dev) the
>>>> MorphTreeMorph class is missing. In fact, it looks like the whole
>>>> System-Settings package is missing.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reason for this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The settings were not used and the next version seemingly will  
>>> change
>>> form an
>>> API perspective.
>>>
>>> Of course, I did not know that the package contained widgets that  
>>> are
>>> used by
>>> others...
>>>
>>> Maybe we can move the  MorphTreeMorph class into the package that
>>> contains the
>>> widgets?
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de
>>> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Beauty is where we see it."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

> Aha, thanks for the clarification. In this case, I will just work with
> it by loading it from Monticello :).
>
> Cheers,
> Doru
>
>
> On 8 Sep 2009, at 08:48, Alain Plantec wrote:
>
>> Hil all,
>>
>> MorphTreeMorph and related are still not mature enough to be
>> considered
>> as part of standard widgets. This is why it is private to the
>> settings
>> package.
>> For 1.0, I think it is better to not integrate it
>> Cheers
>> Alain
>>
>> Marcus Denker a écrit :
>>> On 07.09.2009, at 20:10, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like in the latest Pharo images (both core and dev) the
>>>> MorphTreeMorph class is missing. In fact, it looks like the whole
>>>> System-Settings package is missing.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reason for this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The settings were not used and the next version seemingly will
>>> change
>>> form an
>>> API perspective.
>>>
>>> Of course, I did not know that the package contained widgets that
>>> are
>>> used by
>>> others...
>>>
>>> Maybe we can move the  MorphTreeMorph class into the package that
>>> contains the
>>> widgets?
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marcus Denker - http://marcusdenker.de
>>> PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Beauty is where we see it."
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project