Is it expected that two browsers open on the same class don't reflect the
same state if one of them is used to edit the class? I'm sure this used to work, although I might be getting mixed up with Emacs. TW |
On 27 Feb 2014, at 11:22, Thomas Worthington <[hidden email]> wrote: > Is it expected that two browsers open on the same class don't reflect the same state if one of them is used to edit the class? What do you mean exactly? Normally the two browser should let you browse the same class differently but the class state (iv and methods) should be the same. Now we have missed some announcements. > > I'm sure this used to work, although I might be getting mixed up with Emacs. > > TW > |
This is unexpected ! I was sure this works for all changes. 2014-02-27 20:56 GMT+01:00 Pharo4Stef <[hidden email]>:
|
In reply to this post by pharo4Stef@free.fr
Pharo4Stef wrote:
On 27 Feb 2014, at 11:22, Thomas Worthington [hidden email] wrote:Is it expected that two browsers open on the same class don't reflect the same state if one of them is used to edit the class?What do you mean exactly? Normally the two browser should let you browse the same class differently but the class state (iv and methods) should be the same. Now we have missed some announcements.I'm sure this used to work, although I might be getting mixed up with Emacs. TW I've reproduced this as follows... 1. Open two System Browsers on the same class, showing the class definitions 2. In first Browser add an instance variable --> The second Browser is not updated. https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13006/Browsers-do-not-synchronize-class-definitions Thanks for your report Thomas. cheers -ben |
[hidden email] wrote:
Pharo4Stef wrote:btw, it was working in 30248 and not in 30249On 27 Feb 2014, at 11:22, Thomas Worthington [hidden email] wrote:Is it expected that two browsers open on the same class don't reflect the same state if one of them is used to edit the class?What do you mean exactly? Normally the two browser should let you browse the same class differently but the class state (iv and methods) should be the same. Now we have missed some announcements.I'm sure this used to work, although I might be getting mixed up with Emacs. TW 30249 ----- 11047 Integrate new class builder step 2 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11047 |
can you open a bug entry?
Stef
On 28 Feb 2014, at 05:49, [hidden email] wrote:
|
can you open a bug entry?yes. see below. btw in case someone judges it differently, I tagged it Nice To Have rather than Must Fix.
|
Can it be flagged as a "Must Fix" for a 3.1 release ? It is very easy to have more than one browser open and that becomes even more problematic on a 10" screen ( even tho' I try to work with dual monitors and one a 27" with good resolution, the small screen is a fact of hardware sales and inexpensive devices world-wide, is it not ? And I have the luxury of a comfortable office of my own ... but that is just because I am part of a global "1%" habitation-wise, I should think ... whereas my dream for Smalltalk is Africa, India, China, Malayasia, Indonesia, Tibet, Mongolia ... ( I think of the strong preference for the mac in Quebec as I knew it ... a cultural phenomenon of contrary-to-the-dominant N Am English culture possibly - and that strong mac-preference is still what I see at art, photo and design schools in Boston, MPLS and here in eastern Canada )On 28 February 2014 10:34, <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Robert Shiplett wrote:
Work is underway. You can follow the discussion at the Fogbugz link given below. Can you help with testing? cheers -ben
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |