Need for #'children' in Seaside 3.0?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Need for #'children' in Seaside 3.0?

jgfoster
In a few situations where lack of #'children' would give an error in 2.8 (‘Components not found while processing callbacks’), we do not get an error in 3.0. Is the #'children' method still 'really important' (as claimed by the comment in WAPresenter>>#'children')?

James_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need for #'children' in Seaside 3.0?

Julian Fitzell-2
Hi James,

It's no longer required for callback processing. It is still required
for state backtracking, updating the root and the base url, kicking of
Tasks, and maybe a few other things (basically look for references to
WAVisiblePresenterGuide and WAAllPresenterGuide.

So, depending on what you're doing, you *may* get away without it, but
it's still pretty important.

Julian

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:13 PM, James Foster <[hidden email]> wrote:
> In a few situations where lack of #'children' would give an error in 2.8 (‘Components not found while processing callbacks’), we do not get an error in 3.0. Is the #'children' method still 'really important' (as claimed by the comment in WAPresenter>>#'children')?
>
> James_______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Need for #'children' in Seaside 3.0?

jgfoster
Thanks Julian. I appreciate the explanation.

James

On Feb 8, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> It's no longer required for callback processing. It is still required
> for state backtracking, updating the root and the base url, kicking of
> Tasks, and maybe a few other things (basically look for references to
> WAVisiblePresenterGuide and WAAllPresenterGuide.
>
> So, depending on what you're doing, you *may* get away without it, but
> it's still pretty important.
>
> Julian
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:13 PM, James Foster <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> In a few situations where lack of #'children' would give an error in 2.8 (‘Components not found while processing callbacks’), we do not get an error in 3.0. Is the #'children' method still 'really important' (as claimed by the comment in WAPresenter>>#'children')?
>>
>> James_______________________________________________
>> seaside mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>

_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside