New glossary options for eToys

Dear Localizers and eToys developers,

Please review the attached PO files and express an opinion of which
would be most suitable as a new glossary for the eToys project.
Please carefully weigh the balance between more terms included in the
glossary (higher coverage) and the burden of localizing a bigger
glossary.

etoys_new-templates has 31 files, 5103 strings and 30029 words

etoys_glossary3.po (terms must occur in three different eToys PO files)
etoys_glossary4.po (terms must occur in four different eToys PO files)
etoys_glossary5.po (terms must occur in five different eToys PO files)

Command:
poterminology -o etoys_glossary3.po --progress=verbose
--inputs-needed=3 --term-words=7 etoys_new-templates
Result:
etoys_glossary3.po has 738 strings, 1022 words
 
Command:
poterminology -o etoys_glossary4.po --progress=verbose
--inputs-needed=4 --term-words=7 etoys_new-templates
Result:
etoys_glossary4.po has 417 strings, 498 words

Command:
poterminology -o etoys_glossary5.po --progress=verbose
--inputs-needed=5 --term-words=7 etoys_new-templates
Result:
etoys_glossary5.po has 257 strings, 288 words

cjl

_______________________________________________
etoys-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev

Attachments failed to clear list size limits.  Files can be found here:
http://translate.sugarlabs.org/en/Sandbox/

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Chris Leonard <[hidden email]> wrote: _______________________________________________
etoys-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev