New shape in mondrian

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

New shape in mondrian

Alexandre Bergel-5
The screenshot should be self explainable.
I would love to have EyeSee

Cheers,
Alexandre

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.





_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Screen shot 2010-06-04 at 17.35.10.png (57K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New shape in mondrian

Stéphane Ducasse
but alex mondrian is about nodes and edges
I really suggest that you do not bend it to make other stuff fit into it.
Better start something else
        a library
        that you could use for mondrian and some other experiences

else it will always be clunky

Stef

On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

> The screenshot should be self explainable.
> I would love to have EyeSee
>
> Cheers,
> Alexandre
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
> <Screen shot 2010-06-04 at 17.35.10.png>_______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New shape in mondrian

Alexandre Bergel-4
I agree with this. I made this shape for a punctual need. We are currently experimenting differentiation of code profiling. We need to see the evolution of a metric for a particular program element (class, method or package). Maybe adding such a graph will help, maybe not.

Alexandre


On 7 Jun 2010, at 09:39, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> but alex mondrian is about nodes and edges
> I really suggest that you do not bend it to make other stuff fit into it.
> Better start something else
> a library
> that you could use for mondrian and some other experiences
>
> else it will always be clunky
>
> Stef
>
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
>> The screenshot should be self explainable.
>> I would love to have EyeSee
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alexandre
>>
>> --
>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <Screen shot 2010-06-04 at 17.35.10.png>_______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev


_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New shape in mondrian

Tudor Girba
Hi,

The Shape hierarchy is supposed to be extended as a white-box framework.

However, indeed it would make sense to start investing in a broader  
framework. And yes, EyeSee is still on the to do list ... but it looks  
like it does not yet get to the top. If anyone wants to join, (s)he  
would be welcome :)

Doru


On 7 Jun 2010, at 15:48, Alexandre Bergel wrote:

> I agree with this. I made this shape for a punctual need. We are  
> currently experimenting differentiation of code profiling. We need  
> to see the evolution of a metric for a particular program element  
> (class, method or package). Maybe adding such a graph will help,  
> maybe not.
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On 7 Jun 2010, at 09:39, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> but alex mondrian is about nodes and edges
>> I really suggest that you do not bend it to make other stuff fit  
>> into it.
>> Better start something else
>> a library
>> that you could use for mondrian and some other experiences
>>
>> else it will always be clunky
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Jun 7, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>>
>>> The screenshot should be self explainable.
>>> I would love to have EyeSee
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>> --
>>> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
>>> Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
>>> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <Screen shot 2010-06-04 at  
>>> 17.35.10.png>_______________________________________________
>>> Moose-dev mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"When people care, great things can happen."




_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev