|
I restarted it and now I see 3 projects… is that correct?
Esteban
|
2017-01-06 15:01 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>:
YES Thanks.
|
No wait, now the list of teams is empty ? I am not in any team anymore ? But I can see my name in the list of members of project Pharo2017-01-06 15:05 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>:
|
crap… I will need to check a bit more.
Esteban ps: (maybe a good moment to start testing iceberg and moving projects to git support?) If you execute this: Metacello new baseline: 'Iceberg'; repository: '<a href="github://npasserini/iceberg:multi-remotes" class="">github://npasserini/iceberg:multi-remotes'; load. IceRepository defaultBackendType: #IceLibgitLocalRepository. in one of the VMs here: https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ (the 32bits versions) latest version should work. *except* in macOS where you need to modify LGitLibrary>>macModuleName to answer 'libgit2.dylib'
|
In reply to this post by Nicolai Hess-3-2
I went to a project I knew and there the list was populated. On home screen it was blank. Phil On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Sorry Phil, this feedback is a bit cryptic. No idea what are you saying :) Esteban
|
Upon login I saw none of my projects. The I put a direct Url to one of them. And there were my projects on the side. Phil Le 6 janv. 2017 16:58, "Esteban Lorenzano" <[hidden email]> a écrit :
|
In reply to this post by EstebanLM
I will try because I want to start moving some of my project to iceberg. On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
people still using smalltalkhub ? wow I use it only for MetaRepo, can we please move metarepos also to gihub, there is no reason for them to stay in sthub On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 11:41 AM Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
On 08/01/17 11:22, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
> people still using smalltalkhub ? wow Yes, nearly everyone is still using smalltalkhub and squeaksource and ss3. Stephan |
Squeaksource ?
This even more weird Was it not made read only ? It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far stable than sthub On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 at 13:28, Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: On 08/01/17 11:22, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: |
On 08/01/17 12:54, Dimitris Chloupis wrote:
> Squeaksource ? > > Was it not made read only ? It was fixed and seems to be reliable with the current load ss3 was always stable > It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys > would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far stable > than sthub No, git support is still bleeding edge. A few times a year I check the progress made. Not everything can move to github, and some things need support on older versions and other platforms, and it needs to work everywhere. Not there yet. Stephan |
In reply to this post by Stephane Ducasse-3
> I will try because I want to start moving some of my project to iceberg.
Stef, to me, you are the perfect idea / tool debugger :-) Let us know about your impression and experience report using Iceberg. Alexandre > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote: > crap… I will need to check a bit more. > > Esteban > > ps: (maybe a good moment to start testing iceberg and moving projects to git support?) If you execute this: > > Metacello new > baseline: 'Iceberg'; > repository: 'github://npasserini/iceberg:multi-remotes'; > load. > IceRepository defaultBackendType: #IceLibgitLocalRepository. > > in one of the VMs here: https://dl.bintray.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/ (the 32bits versions) > latest version should work. > > *except* in macOS where you need to modify > > LGitLibrary>>macModuleName > > to answer 'libgit2.dylib' > > >> On 6 Jan 2017, at 15:14, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> No wait, now the list of teams is empty ? I am not in any team anymore ? >> But I can see my name in the list of members of project Pharo >> >> 2017-01-06 15:05 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]>: >> >> >> 2017-01-06 15:01 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]>: >> I restarted it and now I see 3 projects… is that correct? >> >> YES >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 5 Jan 2017, at 23:16, Nicolai Hess <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> All my projects at smalltalkhub.com are gone - again. >>> (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~NicolaiHess) >> >> >> > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
In reply to this post by Stephan Eggermont-3
has worked perfect for , definetly a tons better than sthub and squeaksource and definitely more stable . I do not think I ever experienced a single problem with git and pharo. On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:19 PM Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: On 08/01/17 12:54, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: |
No issues when merging? What about pull-request?
Alexandre > On Jan 8, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Dimitris Chloupis <[hidden email]> wrote: > > has worked perfect for , definetly a tons better than sthub and squeaksource and definitely more stable . I do not think I ever experienced a single problem with git and pharo. > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:19 PM Stephan Eggermont <[hidden email]> wrote: > On 08/01/17 12:54, Dimitris Chloupis wrote: > > Squeaksource ? > > > > Was it not made read only ? > > It was fixed and seems to be reliable with the current load > ss3 was always stable > > > It's been ages since I last visited sthub and ss3 , I thought you guys > > would have moved to github by now or some alternative that is far stable > > than sthub > > No, git support is still bleeding edge. A few times a year I check the > progress made. Not everything can move to github, and some things need > support on older versions and other platforms, and it needs to work > everywhere. Not there yet. > > Stephan > > > -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. |
I had a merge issue once, but merge issues are normal never saw them as problem and with the git gui client I am using it took me a few seconds to resolve. I have not done a pull request but I do not see why I would have any problem On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: No issues when merging? What about pull-request? |
In reply to this post by abergel
to my own regret :) On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote: > I will try because I want to start moving some of my project to iceberg. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |