Smalltalk › Squeak › Squeak - Dev

OCompletion breaks Command+j

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

7 messages Options

Chris Muller-3

OCompletion breaks Command+j

Hello, I like OCompletion so far, but I can't live without Command+j.
Unfortunately it seems to have gotten broken by OCompletion
(ul.88)..?

Levente Uzonyi-2

Re: OCompletion breaks Command+j

On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Chris Muller wrote:

> Hello, I like OCompletion so far, but I can't live without Command+j.
> Unfortunately it seems to have gotten broken by OCompletion
> (ul.88)..?
>
>

All versions break it, because of the way the completion is inserted. If
you know how to do it properly, let me know. Btw the current undo system
is a mess. I'm considering porting the recent TextEditor enhancements from
Pharo. The only problem is that the undo framework has BSD license, so
that has to be reimplemented if we want to stick to MIT only
contributions.

Levente

Bert Freudenberg

Re: OCompletion breaks Command+j

On 09.12.2010, at 11:44, Levente Uzonyi wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Chris Muller wrote:
>
>> Hello, I like OCompletion so far, but I can't live without Command+j.
>> Unfortunately it seems to have gotten broken by OCompletion
>> (ul.88)..?
>>
>>
>
> All versions break it, because of the way the completion is inserted. If you know how to do it properly, let me know. Btw the current undo system is a mess. I'm considering porting the recent TextEditor enhancements from Pharo. The only problem is that the undo framework has BSD license, so that has to be reimplemented if we want to stick to MIT only contributions.

I thought Pharo contributions were required to be MIT-licensed?

- Bert -

Levente Uzonyi-2

Re: OCompletion breaks Command+j

On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

>
> On 09.12.2010, at 11:44, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Chris Muller wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, I like OCompletion so far, but I can't live without Command+j.
>>> Unfortunately it seems to have gotten broken by OCompletion
>>> (ul.88)..?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> All versions break it, because of the way the completion is inserted. If you know how to do it properly, let me know. Btw the current undo system is a mess. I'm considering porting the recent TextEditor enhancements from Pharo. The only problem is that the undo framework has BSD license, so that has to be reimplemented if we want to stick to MIT only contributions.
>
> I thought Pharo contributions were required to be MIT-licensed?

Me too, but they accepted it. It's from Sophie, which has BSD license.

Levente

>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
>

Chris Muller-3

Re: OCompletion breaks Command+j

In reply to this post by Levente Uzonyi-2

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Chris Muller wrote:
>
>> Hello, I like OCompletion so far, but I can't live without Command+j.
>> Unfortunately it seems to have gotten broken by OCompletion
>> (ul.88)..?
>>
>>
>
> All versions break it, because of the way the completion is inserted. If you...

If I select "Use eCompletion instead of OCompletion" then Command+j
works again..

Andreas.Raab

Re: OCompletion breaks Command+j

In reply to this post by Bert Freudenberg

On 12/9/2010 11:48 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:

Yeah, right. Just like here:

http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-August/031713.html

Cheers,
- Andreas

Levente Uzonyi-2

Re: OCompletion breaks Command+j

In reply to this post by Chris Muller-3

On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Chris Muller wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Levente Uzonyi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Chris Muller wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, I like OCompletion so far, but I can't live without Command+j.
>>> Unfortunately it seems to have gotten broken by OCompletion
>>> (ul.88)..?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> All versions break it, because of the way the completion is inserted. If you...
>
> If I select "Use eCompletion instead of OCompletion" then Command+j
> works again..
>
>

Great, I'll check it out.

Levente