Hi -
If Obex should work in a 3.4.1 repo I'd like to give it a try. I have a stone that I've managed to double in size this week and have no real idea why. I saw the repo here: https://github.com/dalehenrich/obex When its convenient please let me know what needs to happen to test it out. Thanks Paul _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Paul,
Sorry for the long delay ... TL;DR, Obex is not ready to be used ... Long answer: The master branch is in the middle of a major rewrite that was aimed at two things ... First the GsBitmap API in 3.4 had changed since I initially started work on Obex and I was making a pass through the code cleaning up the usage of GsBitmap. Second, I realized that an object/pipe-based model for Obex commands would work really well, since as I was playing with Obex a lot, I realized that you typically ran through similar sequences of transformations while tweaking filters and what you wanted to see and of course the object pipe in tODE fits well in that model ... but that meant that I needed to revamp each of the obex commands and strip out the custom transformations and put them into their own command I think I made my last commit into Obex sometime at the beginning of last year, before I was completely consumed by the indexing work for 3.4.0. When I saw your mail (2 months ago now:), I thought that I would be able to find a commit that you could use ... since Obex was basically functional before I started working on the object pipe model ... I spent some time setting up a stone and installing Obex and paging the work that I had done back into my mind ... I actually got to the point where I had found a commit that I thought that would work, but when I began running the examples, in a current 3.4.1 release, ran into issues and thought that I might be able to get a basic example to run ... and then I ran out of time to the extent that I stopped imagining that I could respond to issues that took more than a few minutes to address ... Dale On 03/18/2018 06:25 PM, PAUL DEBRUICKER via Glass wrote: > Hi - > > > If Obex should work in a 3.4.1 repo I'd like to give it a try. I have a stone that I've managed to double in size this week and have no real idea why. I saw the repo here: > > > https://github.com/dalehenrich/obex > > > When its convenient please let me know what needs to happen to test it out. > > > Thanks > > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Glass mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Hi Dale,
No problem on the delay. Obex isn't crucial to anything I'm doing. Would be a 'nice to have' if it ever gets back to working status. IIRC the problem with that stone I'd mentioned was that I'd left a linked topaz session logged in an it wasn't running the MFC properly/at all. So no rush on my end if it ever even happens at all. Thanks Paul GLASS mailing list wrote > Paul, > > Sorry for the long delay ... TL;DR, Obex is not ready to be used ... > > Long answer: > > The master branch is in the middle of a major rewrite that was aimed at > two things ... > > First the GsBitmap API in 3.4 had changed since I initially started work > on Obex and I was making a pass through the code cleaning up the usage > of GsBitmap. > > Second, I realized that an object/pipe-based model for Obex commands > would work really well, since as I was playing with Obex a lot, I > realized that you typically ran through similar sequences of > transformations while tweaking filters and what you wanted to see and of > course the object pipe in tODE fits well in that model ... but that > meant that I needed to revamp each of the obex commands and strip out > the custom transformations and put them into their own command > > I think I made my last commit into Obex sometime at the beginning of > last year, before I was completely consumed by the indexing work for > 3.4.0. > > When I saw your mail (2 months ago now:), I thought that I would be able > to find a commit that you could use ... since Obex was basically > functional before I started working on the object pipe model ... I spent > some time setting up a stone and installing Obex and paging the work > that I had done back into my mind ... I actually got to the point where > I had found a commit that I thought that would work, but when I began > running the examples, in a current 3.4.1 release, ran into issues and > thought that I might be able to get a basic example to run ... and then > I ran out of time to the extent that I stopped imagining that I could > respond to issues that took more than a few minutes to address ... > > Dale > > On 03/18/2018 06:25 PM, PAUL DEBRUICKER via Glass wrote: >> Hi - >> >> >> If Obex should work in a 3.4.1 repo I'd like to give it a try. I have a >> stone that I've managed to double in size this week and have no real idea >> why. I saw the repo here: >> >> >> https://github.com/dalehenrich/obex >> >> >> When its convenient please let me know what needs to happen to test it >> out. >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> Glass mailing list >> > Glass@.gemtalksystems >> http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass > > _______________________________________________ > Glass mailing list > Glass@.gemtalksystems > http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/GLASS-f1460844.html _______________________________________________ Glass mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |