Hi!
I believe having a nice support for examples is very important. And the current effort is a nice step toward ubiquitous examples.
But I feel something is weird with the current way to define an example.
I may have raised that problem earlier. But since it is bugging me seriously, I raise it again :-)
If I want to have an example of RTView, I can define the following method:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RTView class>>exampleUsingView
| v |
v := RTView new.
v add: RTBox element.
v open
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Pressing on the icon will open the view in a window, great. But when I run the test, this method exampleUsingView opens the window. And I do not want that :-(
Instead, I use do not use #example in the method name. But this is awkward...
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev
Locked
