Open Pharo debugger from a Seaside wallback

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
24 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Open Pharo debugger from a Seaside wallback

Mariano Martinez Peck
As Stef said...do you have some anti-virus program like nod-32 or something like that ?  in such case you should exclude the directory where you have your Pharo image.

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:

> It continues taking longer 15 seconds on 1.1 too, there isn't change. I will try to compare with Squeak looking for the possible problem and its solution.
>
> nobody has the same problem?

No and this is strange because 1.1 got a lot of the stream changes that made squeak faster.

>
> Thank you,
> Facu
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>
> > Stef,
> > I'm using Pharo 1.0 RC2 with Seaside 2.8.4 and all is fine but it took over 15 seconds open a smalltalk debugger from a Seaside wallback. It was the reason of my first mail.
> > I tried with Squeak 4.1 RC4, to discard a network configuration problem at operative system level, and i don't have the problem. It takes 1 second to open the debugger.
> > Then, Marcus ask to me if i had the same problem with "PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE", at that time I download it, installed Seaside and try again. To Install Seaside took to me over 20 minutes but I had been instaled it on Pharo 1.0 and was been fine.
>
> ok so with 1.1 this is working?
> There were a **lot** of changes in 1.1. We will release shortly after 1.0 and much much faster :)
>
> > Is it more clear now ?. Please, sorry for my poor English.
>
> Don;t worry. write simple sentences and we will understand you.
> >
> > Facu
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > This is really strange. Can you describe your setup? Do you have an antivirus? And with Squeak you do not have that behavior?
> > We are loading larger code than seaside in Pharo and we do not have this problem.
> > So I would really like to understand. Could you post your image somewhere?
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> >
> > > Stef,
> > > It took to me over 20 minutes to complete the Seaside 2.8 installation and when I interrupted it the debugger opened when the system was writting the pharoXXX.changes always but I couldn't check what is happening.
> > >
> > > I will check it again.
> > >
> > > Facu
> > >
> > > ps: I refered to pharoXXX.changes as "log" because of Visual Smalltalk where the "changes" are called changes.log, excuse me.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Marcus,
> > > > I can't install Seaside on Pharo 1.1(*) but then i'll try again at home.
> > > >
> > > > It isn't my point to compare Pharo to Squeak performance but I used Squeak to test this particular situation.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > >
> > > > Facu
> > > >
> > > > (*) it's very slow to write the log taking minutes to complete the instalation
> > >
> > > which log?
> > >
> > > Stef
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Lukas,
> > > > >> It happens on my machine with Windows/(Firefox-Chrome-IE 8) and Pharo.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> But I test it on the same machine with Squeak 4.1 RC4 and it go very very fast
> > > > >> to open de smalltalk debugger.
> > > > >> Furthermore, Squeak 4.1 RC4 seem to be faster than Pharo, did you note that too or it's only my sensations?
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you check with Pharo 1.1?
> > > > >
> > > > >       https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26762/PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE.1.zip
> > > > >
> > > > > In general, Squeak 4.1 should not be compared to Pharo 1.0 speed-wise, but Pharo 1.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > My theory for your bug is that it's this:
> > > >
> > > >        http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=860
> > > >
> > > > We added it to 1.1 on Nov. 01, 2009. Not to 1.0, because 1.0 was supposed to be released
> > > > "very soon".
> > > >
> > > >        Marcus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> > > > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Facundo Vozzi
> > > > InfOil S.A.
> > > > Project Leader
> > > > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Facundo Vozzi
> > > InfOil S.A.
> > > Project Leader
> > > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > > [hidden email]
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Facundo Vozzi
> > InfOil S.A.
> > Project Leader
> > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > [hidden email]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
>
> --
> Facundo Vozzi
> InfOil S.A.
> Project Leader
> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> [hidden email]
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Open Pharo debugger from a Seaside wallback

fvozzi
Mariano,
I had to uninstall nod-32 and the problem disappeared. I don't know why the 
problem doesn't happen with Squeak but it's ok on Pharo now.

Thanks and sorry by my confusion,
Facu

2010/4/12 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>
As Stef said...do you have some anti-virus program like nod-32 or something like that ?  in such case you should exclude the directory where you have your Pharo image.


On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:

> It continues taking longer 15 seconds on 1.1 too, there isn't change. I will try to compare with Squeak looking for the possible problem and its solution.
>
> nobody has the same problem?

No and this is strange because 1.1 got a lot of the stream changes that made squeak faster.

>
> Thank you,
> Facu
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>
> > Stef,
> > I'm using Pharo 1.0 RC2 with Seaside 2.8.4 and all is fine but it took over 15 seconds open a smalltalk debugger from a Seaside wallback. It was the reason of my first mail.
> > I tried with Squeak 4.1 RC4, to discard a network configuration problem at operative system level, and i don't have the problem. It takes 1 second to open the debugger.
> > Then, Marcus ask to me if i had the same problem with "PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE", at that time I download it, installed Seaside and try again. To Install Seaside took to me over 20 minutes but I had been instaled it on Pharo 1.0 and was been fine.
>
> ok so with 1.1 this is working?
> There were a **lot** of changes in 1.1. We will release shortly after 1.0 and much much faster :)
>
> > Is it more clear now ?. Please, sorry for my poor English.
>
> Don;t worry. write simple sentences and we will understand you.
> >
> > Facu
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > This is really strange. Can you describe your setup? Do you have an antivirus? And with Squeak you do not have that behavior?
> > We are loading larger code than seaside in Pharo and we do not have this problem.
> > So I would really like to understand. Could you post your image somewhere?
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> >
> > > Stef,
> > > It took to me over 20 minutes to complete the Seaside 2.8 installation and when I interrupted it the debugger opened when the system was writting the pharoXXX.changes always but I couldn't check what is happening.
> > >
> > > I will check it again.
> > >
> > > Facu
> > >
> > > ps: I refered to pharoXXX.changes as "log" because of Visual Smalltalk where the "changes" are called changes.log, excuse me.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> > >
> > > > Marcus,
> > > > I can't install Seaside on Pharo 1.1(*) but then i'll try again at home.
> > > >
> > > > It isn't my point to compare Pharo to Squeak performance but I used Squeak to test this particular situation.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > >
> > > > Facu
> > > >
> > > > (*) it's very slow to write the log taking minutes to complete the instalation
> > >
> > > which log?
> > >
> > > Stef
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Lukas,
> > > > >> It happens on my machine with Windows/(Firefox-Chrome-IE 8) and Pharo.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> But I test it on the same machine with Squeak 4.1 RC4 and it go very very fast
> > > > >> to open de smalltalk debugger.
> > > > >> Furthermore, Squeak 4.1 RC4 seem to be faster than Pharo, did you note that too or it's only my sensations?
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you check with Pharo 1.1?
> > > > >
> > > > >       https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26762/PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE.1.zip
> > > > >
> > > > > In general, Squeak 4.1 should not be compared to Pharo 1.0 speed-wise, but Pharo 1.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > My theory for your bug is that it's this:
> > > >
> > > >        http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=860
> > > >
> > > > We added it to 1.1 on Nov. 01, 2009. Not to 1.0, because 1.0 was supposed to be released
> > > > "very soon".
> > > >
> > > >        Marcus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> > > > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Facundo Vozzi
> > > > InfOil S.A.
> > > > Project Leader
> > > > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > > [hidden email]
> > > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Facundo Vozzi
> > > InfOil S.A.
> > > Project Leader
> > > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > > [hidden email]
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Facundo Vozzi
> > InfOil S.A.
> > Project Leader
> > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > [hidden email]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
>
> --
> Facundo Vozzi
> InfOil S.A.
> Project Leader
> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> [hidden email]
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project



--
Facundo Vozzi
InfOil S.A.
Project Leader
(+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
[hidden email]

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Open Pharo debugger from a Seaside wallback

Adrian Lienhard
Thanks for asking and answering the problem. I've add an item to www.pharo-project.org/documentation/faq as it has become a FAQ.

Adrian

On Apr 14, 2010, at 15:21 , Facundo Vozzi wrote:

> Mariano,
> I had to uninstall nod-32 and the problem disappeared. I don't know why the
> problem doesn't happen with Squeak but it's ok on Pharo now.
>
> Thanks and sorry by my confusion,
> Facu
>
> 2010/4/12 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>
>
>> As Stef said...do you have some anti-virus program like nod-32 or something
>> like that ?  in such case you should exclude the directory where you have
>> your Pharo image.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>
>>>> It continues taking longer 15 seconds on 1.1 too, there isn't change. I
>>> will try to compare with Squeak looking for the possible problem and its
>>> solution.
>>>>
>>>> nobody has the same problem?
>>>
>>> No and this is strange because 1.1 got a lot of the stream changes that
>>> made squeak faster.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Facu
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stef,
>>>>> I'm using Pharo 1.0 RC2 with Seaside 2.8.4 and all is fine but it took
>>> over 15 seconds open a smalltalk debugger from a Seaside wallback. It was
>>> the reason of my first mail.
>>>>> I tried with Squeak 4.1 RC4, to discard a network configuration
>>> problem at operative system level, and i don't have the problem. It takes 1
>>> second to open the debugger.
>>>>> Then, Marcus ask to me if i had the same problem with
>>> "PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE", at that time I download it, installed
>>> Seaside and try again. To Install Seaside took to me over 20 minutes but I
>>> had been instaled it on Pharo 1.0 and was been fine.
>>>>
>>>> ok so with 1.1 this is working?
>>>> There were a **lot** of changes in 1.1. We will release shortly after
>>> 1.0 and much much faster :)
>>>>
>>>>> Is it more clear now ?. Please, sorry for my poor English.
>>>>
>>>> Don;t worry. write simple sentences and we will understand you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Facu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> This is really strange. Can you describe your setup? Do you have an
>>> antivirus? And with Squeak you do not have that behavior?
>>>>> We are loading larger code than seaside in Pharo and we do not have
>>> this problem.
>>>>> So I would really like to understand. Could you post your image
>>> somewhere?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stef
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stef,
>>>>>> It took to me over 20 minutes to complete the Seaside 2.8
>>> installation and when I interrupted it the debugger opened when the system
>>> was writting the pharoXXX.changes always but I couldn't check what is
>>> happening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will check it again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Facu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ps: I refered to pharoXXX.changes as "log" because of Visual
>>> Smalltalk where the "changes" are called changes.log, excuse me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marcus,
>>>>>>> I can't install Seaside on Pharo 1.1(*) but then i'll try again at
>>> home.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It isn't my point to compare Pharo to Squeak performance but I
>>> used Squeak to test this particular situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Facu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (*) it's very slow to write the log taking minutes to complete the
>>> instalation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which log?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stef
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Marcus Denker <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lukas,
>>>>>>>>> It happens on my machine with Windows/(Firefox-Chrome-IE 8) and
>>> Pharo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I test it on the same machine with Squeak 4.1 RC4 and it go
>>> very very fast
>>>>>>>>> to open de smalltalk debugger.
>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, Squeak 4.1 RC4 seem to be faster than Pharo, did
>>> you note that too or it's only my sensations?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did you check with Pharo 1.1?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26762/PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE.1.zip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In general, Squeak 4.1 should not be compared to Pharo 1.0
>>> speed-wise, but Pharo 1.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My theory for your bug is that it's this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=860
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We added it to 1.1 on Nov. 01, 2009. Not to 1.0, because 1.0 was
>>> supposed to be released
>>>>>>> "very soon".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Marcus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
>>>>>>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>>>>> Project Leader
>>>>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>>>> Project Leader
>>>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>>> Project Leader
>>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>> Project Leader
>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Facundo Vozzi
> InfOil S.A.
> Project Leader
> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> [hidden email]
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Open Pharo debugger from a Seaside wallback

Mariano Martinez Peck
The problem SHOULD happens with both, Squeak and Pharo. The problem is basically that when using Monticello (mostly) some files like .changes are modifying a lot and then, the Antivirus is trying to analyze it. This problem has appeared several times. Mostly with Nod32 but also with other antivirus. The easiest solution is to add the directory where the .image and .changes are, to the "excluded" folders in the Nod32 configuration.

Cheers

Mariano

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Adrian Lienhard <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thanks for asking and answering the problem. I've add an item to www.pharo-project.org/documentation/faq as it has become a FAQ.

Adrian

On Apr 14, 2010, at 15:21 , Facundo Vozzi wrote:

> Mariano,
> I had to uninstall nod-32 and the problem disappeared. I don't know why the
> problem doesn't happen with Squeak but it's ok on Pharo now.
>
> Thanks and sorry by my confusion,
> Facu
>
> 2010/4/12 Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]>
>
>> As Stef said...do you have some anti-virus program like nod-32 or something
>> like that ?  in such case you should exclude the directory where you have
>> your Pharo image.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>
>>>> It continues taking longer 15 seconds on 1.1 too, there isn't change. I
>>> will try to compare with Squeak looking for the possible problem and its
>>> solution.
>>>>
>>>> nobody has the same problem?
>>>
>>> No and this is strange because 1.1 got a lot of the stream changes that
>>> made squeak faster.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Facu
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Stef,
>>>>> I'm using Pharo 1.0 RC2 with Seaside 2.8.4 and all is fine but it took
>>> over 15 seconds open a smalltalk debugger from a Seaside wallback. It was
>>> the reason of my first mail.
>>>>> I tried with Squeak 4.1 RC4, to discard a network configuration
>>> problem at operative system level, and i don't have the problem. It takes 1
>>> second to open the debugger.
>>>>> Then, Marcus ask to me if i had the same problem with
>>> "PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE", at that time I download it, installed
>>> Seaside and try again. To Install Seaside took to me over 20 minutes but I
>>> had been instaled it on Pharo 1.0 and was been fine.
>>>>
>>>> ok so with 1.1 this is working?
>>>> There were a **lot** of changes in 1.1. We will release shortly after
>>> 1.0 and much much faster :)
>>>>
>>>>> Is it more clear now ?. Please, sorry for my poor English.
>>>>
>>>> Don;t worry. write simple sentences and we will understand you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Facu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>> This is really strange. Can you describe your setup? Do you have an
>>> antivirus? And with Squeak you do not have that behavior?
>>>>> We are loading larger code than seaside in Pharo and we do not have
>>> this problem.
>>>>> So I would really like to understand. Could you post your image
>>> somewhere?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stef
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stef,
>>>>>> It took to me over 20 minutes to complete the Seaside 2.8
>>> installation and when I interrupted it the debugger opened when the system
>>> was writting the pharoXXX.changes always but I couldn't check what is
>>> happening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will check it again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Facu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ps: I refered to pharoXXX.changes as "log" because of Visual
>>> Smalltalk where the "changes" are called changes.log, excuse me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marcus,
>>>>>>> I can't install Seaside on Pharo 1.1(*) but then i'll try again at
>>> home.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It isn't my point to compare Pharo to Squeak performance but I
>>> used Squeak to test this particular situation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Facu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (*) it's very slow to write the log taking minutes to complete the
>>> instalation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which log?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stef
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Marcus Denker <
>>> [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lukas,
>>>>>>>>> It happens on my machine with Windows/(Firefox-Chrome-IE 8) and
>>> Pharo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But I test it on the same machine with Squeak 4.1 RC4 and it go
>>> very very fast
>>>>>>>>> to open de smalltalk debugger.
>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, Squeak 4.1 RC4 seem to be faster than Pharo, did
>>> you note that too or it's only my sensations?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did you check with Pharo 1.1?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26762/PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE.1.zip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In general, Squeak 4.1 should not be compared to Pharo 1.0
>>> speed-wise, but Pharo 1.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My theory for your bug is that it's this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=860
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We added it to 1.1 on Nov. 01, 2009. Not to 1.0, because 1.0 was
>>> supposed to be released
>>>>>>> "very soon".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Marcus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
>>>>>>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>>>>> Project Leader
>>>>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>>>
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>>>> Project Leader
>>>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>>> Project Leader
>>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>>> [hidden email]
>>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Facundo Vozzi
>>>> InfOil S.A.
>>>> Project Leader
>>>> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Facundo Vozzi
> InfOil S.A.
> Project Leader
> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> [hidden email]
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
12