-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Hallo, on my package I have found an older patch, which I have introduced during the review process of the Fedora package to rename the autconf package name of gnu-smalltalk from smalltalk to gnu-smalltalk. Below you may find this patch for upstream integration. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt diff -up smalltalk-3.2/configure.ac.auto smalltalk-3.2/configure.ac - --- smalltalk-3.2/configure.ac.auto 2010-04-21 11:25:01.000000000 +0200 +++ smalltalk-3.2/configure.ac 2010-05-02 19:49:27.926724024 +0200 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ dnl Process this file with autoconf to p dnl 2.63 needed by testsuite, actually AC_PREREQ(2.63) - -AC_INIT([GNU Smalltalk], 3.2, [hidden email], smalltalk, +AC_INIT([GNU Smalltalk], 3.2, [hidden email], gnu-smalltalk, [http://smalltalk.gnu.org/]) MAINTAINER="[hidden email]" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAkwji0EACgkQZLAIBz9lVu/stgQA0QFw2YtzfOHThBSLocplyHHs S3YPChYHuAO2iFNl/11yEaaSYeRBGsSqDtJEDnC7vwy2aQiC2Fix6CxJ9aIfet/2 GrrSm5UcUQeY0loyYVmawymW8F80EM05uXuV8r6LaoIFRf0/4+qm5xKU9hd50MXh CxR2I4okZnnK9WHPb3g= =BlJW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
On 06/24/2010 06:43 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hallo, > > on my package I have found an older patch, which I have introduced > during the review process of the Fedora package to rename the > autconf package name of gnu-smalltalk from smalltalk to gnu-smalltalk. Although most distros will carry a patch like this one, unfortunately it is not suitable for integration upstream because it would change the tarball file name. Thanks anyway! Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Am 24.06.2010 18:44, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > On 06/24/2010 06:43 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hallo, >> >> on my package I have found an older patch, which I have >> introduced during the review process of the Fedora package to >> rename the autconf package name of gnu-smalltalk from smalltalk >> to gnu-smalltalk. > > Although most distros will carry a patch like this one, > unfortunately it is not suitable for integration upstream because > it would change the tarball file name. %setup -q instead of %setup -q -n smalltalk-%{version} Additional of changing the Source tag this is a simple change for me. And an additional advance may be the fact, that the upsteam source archiv has the same basename as the package in the distributions. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iJwEAQECAAYFAkwjkigACgkQZLAIBz9lVu/ZIQQA1U3K54v80RaJy122E6hUia0e sfqIu8/d7nhgnP68PhrAn5rUU8mmq6deYHTvxUR/fh/kQ/AnBujFjbmoTVeoKQte as+xlQqEcI5Bs9O1YlfkgHAOlp4Iyb4qrN0uUagWeogJzOU38Dn5QHyDY9Ydj+sF xKa5lUUVmNcWHAJhKrU= =MspH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
On 06/24/2010 07:13 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 24.06.2010 18:44, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> On 06/24/2010 06:43 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hallo, >>> >>> on my package I have found an older patch, which I have >>> introduced during the review process of the Fedora package to >>> rename the autconf package name of gnu-smalltalk from smalltalk >>> to gnu-smalltalk. >> >> Although most distros will carry a patch like this one, >> unfortunately it is not suitable for integration upstream because >> it would change the tarball file name. > > That may be prefer by me I suspected that :) but it would also mean complicating lives of potentially many users that rely on the layout of ftp://ftp.gnu.org/ In other words, I don't disagree with the change, it's just that I cannot do it. Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |