Package organization: from structural to ...

> Hi guys
>
> I'm starting to work on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2635
>        which I split into
>                http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2875
>
> Now after I will apply Seaside decomposition to have Test "in their package"
>
> Tests-ToolBuilder
>        -> ToolBuilder-Test
>
> Now in addition I would like to have
>
> Kernel
>        the right stuff there
>
> Collection-Kernel
>        Containing what is needed for the core
>        I prefer that to Kernel-Collection
>        since people that want to look at collection will fin it grouped in Collection
>        but the kernel means that we know that they will be for the kernel
>        Now for Array we will have
>
>                Array will be in
>                Collection-Kernel
>                Collection-Kernel-Test
>
> Stef
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>

> Maybe
> Collections-Kernel
> i.e. not Collection, but Collections
> ?
>
> On 27 August 2010 16:37, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hi guys
>>
>> I'm starting to work on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2635
>>        which I split into
>>                http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2875
>>
>> Now after I will apply Seaside decomposition to have Test "in their package"
>>
>> Tests-ToolBuilder
>>        -> ToolBuilder-Test
>>
>> Now in addition I would like to have
>>
>> Kernel
>>        the right stuff there
>>
>> Collection-Kernel
>>        Containing what is needed for the core
>>        I prefer that to Kernel-Collection
>>        since people that want to look at collection will fin it grouped in Collection
>>        but the kernel means that we know that they will be for the kernel
>>        Now for Array we will have
>>
>>                Array will be in
>>                Collection-Kernel
>>                Collection-Kernel-Test
>>
>> Stef
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users

> Stef
>
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> Maybe
>> Collections-Kernel
>> i.e. not Collection, but Collections
>> ?
>>
>> On 27 August 2010 16:37, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Hi guys
>>>
>>> I'm starting to work on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2635
>>>        which I split into
>>>                http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2875
>>>
>>> Now after I will apply Seaside decomposition to have Test "in their package"
>>>
>>> Tests-ToolBuilder
>>>        -> ToolBuilder-Test
>>>
>>> Now in addition I would like to have
>>>
>>> Kernel
>>>        the right stuff there
>>>
>>> Collection-Kernel
>>>        Containing what is needed for the core
>>>        I prefer that to Kernel-Collection
>>>        since people that want to look at collection will fin it grouped in Collection
>>>        but the kernel means that we know that they will be for the kernel
>>>        Now for Array we will have
>>>
>>>                Array will be in
>>>                Collection-Kernel
>>>                Collection-Kernel-Test
>>>
>>> Stef
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>

>
>> Stef
>>
>> On Aug 30, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe
>>> Collections-Kernel
>>> i.e. not Collection, but Collections
>>> ?
>>>
>>> On 27 August 2010 16:37, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> I'm starting to work on http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2635
>>>>        which I split into
>>>>                http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2875
>>>>
>>>> Now after I will apply Seaside decomposition to have Test "in their package"
>>>>
>>>> Tests-ToolBuilder
>>>>        -> ToolBuilder-Test
>>>>
>>>> Now in addition I would like to have
>>>>
>>>> Kernel
>>>>        the right stuff there
>>>>
>>>> Collection-Kernel
>>>>        Containing what is needed for the core
>>>>        I prefer that to Kernel-Collection
>>>>        since people that want to look at collection will fin it grouped in Collection
>>>>        but the kernel means that we know that they will be for the kernel
>>>>        Now for Array we will have
>>>>
>>>>                Array will be in
>>>>                Collection-Kernel
>>>>                Collection-Kernel-Test
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-users mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-users mailing list
>>> [hidden email]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-users mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-users mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users