After browsing more code I think that having a PackageOrganiser would
support better the migration of existing code.
Stef
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:23 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> Stef,
>
> I'm not sure I'm following what you mean by a single class. I would
> probably go for a singleton manager and a package class with
> instances for each package.
>
> Loosely related , it would be _really_ nice to be able to assign
> multiple categories to methods.
>
> Bill
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
[hidden email] [mailto:pharo-
>
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 2:36 PM
> To: Pharo Development
> Subject: [Pharo-project] PackageOrganizer vs Package class side
>
> Hi all
>
> I coded a bit with david today on the package support and I would
> like to know what you think about having Package class side methods
> for register, named: ...... vs having and explicit separate class.
>
> I'm tend towards having one single class.
>
> Right now in Pharo packageInfo and PackageOrganizer responsibility
> are not that clear.
>
> Stef
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project