This is not so much a question or bug report, but I'd like to hear a few opinions on this.
-- With the latest VAST version I get more and more warning due to unimplemented methods. There have been a few unimplemented methods in GLORP, like #descending and #desc that lead to quite a few warnings in the packager, and pof course also in SmallLint checks. With the latest additions of the deprecated: sends in quite a few places in Glorp, I now see hundreds of warnings like #sunset not being implemented. Sure, there is the option of adding packaging rules. But I don't really like that and it is not a solution for SmallLint. So what do people think about implementing a few dummy methods somewhere in Glorp that make the packager and Lint a bit happier? Joachim You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "glorp-group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/glorp-group. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Regarding selectors that are converted to functions or operators such
as desc, avg, etc, I got some of those warnings in Pharo, so I guess that having a separate package implementing these missing methods won't hurt. I don't know if this adds to your response, but given that Glorp is primarily developed in VW and then ported to VAST and other dialects, I'd like a joint force to start migrating it to use Grease as a dialect neutral layer. There is a lot of love that can be added to the code of Glorp. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2017-05-02 11:17 GMT-03:00 jtuchel <[hidden email]>: > This is not so much a question or bug report, but I'd like to hear a few > opinions on this. > > With the latest VAST version I get more and more warning due to > unimplemented methods. There have been a few unimplemented methods in GLORP, > like #descending and #desc that lead to quite a few warnings in the > packager, and pof course also in SmallLint checks. > > With the latest additions of the deprecated: sends in quite a few places in > Glorp, I now see hundreds of warnings like #sunset not being implemented. > > Sure, there is the option of adding packaging rules. But I don't really like > that and it is not a solution for SmallLint. > > So what do people think about implementing a few dummy methods somewhere in > Glorp that make the packager and Lint a bit happier? > > > Joachim > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "glorp-group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [hidden email]. > To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/glorp-group. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "glorp-group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. To post to this group, send email to [hidden email]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/glorp-group. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |