Performance in Workspace
Locked
 
|
I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP with a 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or more to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version?
|
|
|
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I have installed setup_pharo1.0-10466-BETAdev09.10.1.exe on Windows XP with a > 1.6GHz processor. Evaluating "3 + 4" or "Time now" takes about 1 sec or more > to print the result. Is this expected for this beta version? Takes no time on my computer. Could you please print the result of this expression: [Time now] timeToRun -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Robert Kovacic
Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with NOD32 (and any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the changes file and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the Pharo directory from the scan list.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Damien Cassou
I obtained the following results: "[3 + 4] timeToRun 0" and "[Time now ] timeToRun 0", however it still took about a second before each result was displayed (the hour glass icon flashed on briefly for each evaluation).
In reply to the OP I am running the release version of Microsoft Security Essentials.
|
|
|
In reply to this post by gcotelli
I am running Microsoft Security Essentials and excluding the Pharo directory from the scan list as you suggested has solved the problem thank you.
|
|
|
I forgot to ask - should I report this to the Bug List?
|
Re: Performance in Workspace
|
|
On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:23 34AM, Robert Kovacic wrote: > > I forgot to ask - should I report this to the Bug List? Seems like an issue more suited in a FAQ or something to me, not much we can really do do "fix" it... Maybe http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/faq/pharo deserves an entry about this? Cheers, Henry > > > Robert Kovacic wrote: >> >> I am running Microsoft Security Essentials and excluding the Pharo >> directory from the scan list as you suggested has solved the >> problem thank >> you. >> >> >> Gabriel Cotelli wrote: >>> >>> Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with >>> NOD32 >>> (and >>> any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the >>> changes >>> file >>> and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the >>> Pharo >>> directory from the scan list. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <[hidden email]> >>> wrote: _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
Could somebody that knows the issue a bit better than me write the FAQ
entry? I'll add it to either of the two FAQs then. Reporting an issue makes only sense if you do it over at MS... ;) Cheers, Adrian On Oct 6, 2009, at 09:20 , Henrik Johansen wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:23 34AM, Robert Kovacic wrote: > >> >> I forgot to ask - should I report this to the Bug List? > > Seems like an issue more suited in a FAQ or something to me, not much > we can really do do "fix" it... > Maybe http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/faq/pharo deserves an entry about this? > > Cheers, > Henry > >> >> >> Robert Kovacic wrote: >>> >>> I am running Microsoft Security Essentials and excluding the Pharo >>> directory from the scan list as you suggested has solved the >>> problem thank >>> you. >>> >>> >>> Gabriel Cotelli wrote: >>>> >>>> Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with >>>> NOD32 >>>> (and >>>> any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the >>>> changes >>>> file >>>> and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the >>>> Pharo >>>> directory from the scan list. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic <[hidden email]> >>>> wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
|
|
In reply to this post by Henrik Sperre Johansen
Given Microsoft Security Essentials is free, it's reasonable to assume that over time a significant percentage of Windows machines will have it installed. It would be a shame if people new to or evaluating Pharo were turned off by a known issue that so severely affects performance but has such a simple solution.
I would go so far as to suggest that a message be displayed in the Workspace of the fresh downloaded image for this (and any other similar issues). Regards, Robert Kovacic
|
Re: Performance in Workspace
|
|
well we are not all on windows :)
so an FAQ entry is the most appropriate action. stef On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Robert Kovacic wrote: > > Given Microsoft Security Essentials is free, it's reasonable to > assume that > over time a significant percentage of Windows machines will have it > installed. It would be a shame if people new to or evaluating Pharo > were > turned off by a known issue that so severely affects performance but > has > such a simple solution. > > I would go so far as to suggest that a message be displayed in the > Workspace > of the fresh downloaded image for this (and any other similar issues). > > Regards, Robert Kovacic > > > Henrik Johansen wrote: >> >> >> On Oct 6, 2009, at 3:23 34AM, Robert Kovacic wrote: >> >>> >>> I forgot to ask - should I report this to the Bug List? >> >> Seems like an issue more suited in a FAQ or something to me, not much >> we can really do do "fix" it... >> Maybe http://scg.unibe.ch/wiki/faq/pharo deserves an entry about >> this? >> >> Cheers, >> Henry >> >>> >>> >>> Robert Kovacic wrote: >>>> >>>> I am running Microsoft Security Essentials and excluding the Pharo >>>> directory from the scan list as you suggested has solved the >>>> problem thank >>>> you. >>>> >>>> >>>> Gabriel Cotelli wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Have you any antivirus software running? There's some issues with >>>>> NOD32 >>>>> (and >>>>> any other that I can't remember now) scanning all the time the >>>>> changes >>>>> file >>>>> and making Pharo/Squeak unusable. If it's the problem exclude the >>>>> Pharo >>>>> directory from the scan list. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Robert Kovacic >>>>> <[hidden email]> >>>>> wrote: >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Performance-in-Workspace-tp3772302p3773622.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |