I wrote this test pre-closure.
The problem with closures is that they are optimized to retain a pointer to the values of outer temporary variable they use when activated. Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject all refer to 'hello' pointed by o1 and its copy pointed by o2. In other words, o1 and o2 are not the single pointers to the String 'hello' and its copy. thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to clean the closures that still point to 'hello'... Thus, 'hello' is not finalized. One possibility is to also clean the closures pointing to 'hello'. But now the code is tricky... It's aim was to be simple damned :) Nicolas here is a corrected version : testFinalizationOfEquals "self debug: #testFinalizationOfEquals" | finalizationProbe o1 o2 forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted | finalizationProbe := Set new. o1 := 'hello' copy. o2 := 'hello' copy. forAnyTwoEqualObjects := [o1 = o2]. ofDifferentIdentity := [o1 ~~ o2]. registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := [ o1 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'first object finalized'. o2 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'second object finalized']. thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects := [ forAnyTwoEqualObjects := ofDifferentIdentity := registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := nil. o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted := [finalizationProbe size = 2]. self assert: forAnyTwoEqualObjects; assert: ofDifferentIdentity; should: [ registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject value. thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects value. implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted value]. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Oh, now it fails due to WeakIdentityKeyDictionary bug...
Nicolas 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: > I wrote this test pre-closure. > The problem with closures is that they are optimized to retain a > pointer to the values of outer temporary variable they use when > activated. > Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity > registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject all refer to 'hello' > pointed by o1 and its copy pointed by o2. > In other words, o1 and o2 are not the single pointers to the String > 'hello' and its copy. > thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to > clean the closures that still point to 'hello'... > Thus, 'hello' is not finalized. > One possibility is to also clean the closures pointing to 'hello'. > But now the code is tricky... It's aim was to be simple damned :) > > Nicolas > > > here is a corrected version : > > > testFinalizationOfEquals > "self debug: #testFinalizationOfEquals" > > | finalizationProbe o1 o2 > forAnyTwoEqualObjects > ofDifferentIdentity > registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject > thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects > implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted | > > finalizationProbe := Set new. > o1 := 'hello' copy. > o2 := 'hello' copy. > forAnyTwoEqualObjects := [o1 = o2]. > ofDifferentIdentity := [o1 ~~ o2]. > registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := [ > o1 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'first object finalized'. > o2 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'second object > finalized']. > thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects := [ > forAnyTwoEqualObjects := ofDifferentIdentity := > registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := nil. > o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. > implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted := [finalizationProbe size = 2]. > > self > assert: forAnyTwoEqualObjects; > assert: ofDifferentIdentity; > should: [ > registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject value. > thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects value. > implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted value]. > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Ah Ah, I found the guilty:
Set>> do: use 1 to: array size do: [:i | (array at: i) ... But array inst. var can be overwritten inside the loop due to #rehash OK, OK, I thought I would catch it be redefining do: in WeakKeyDictionary do: aBlock "This needs to be redefined because array inst. var. can eventually be overwritten during the loop (due to rehash, due to fullCheck) and make super fail." tally = 0 ifTrue: [^ self]. array do: [:each | each ifNotNil: [aBlock value: each]] But ARGHH SUPER EVIL, this method does not get executed BECAUSE : Dictionary>>associationsDo: aBlock "Evaluate aBlock for each of the receiver's elements (key/value associations)." super do: aBlock ARGHH, it really uses super do:, not my brand new #do: This is a good reason I DON'T LIKE INVOKING super WITH A DIFFERENT selector... Does not matter, I will just redefine Set>>do:, but that was my evil minute of the day... Nicolas 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: > Oh, now it fails due to WeakIdentityKeyDictionary bug... > > Nicolas > > 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: >> I wrote this test pre-closure. >> The problem with closures is that they are optimized to retain a >> pointer to the values of outer temporary variable they use when >> activated. >> Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject all refer to 'hello' >> pointed by o1 and its copy pointed by o2. >> In other words, o1 and o2 are not the single pointers to the String >> 'hello' and its copy. >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to >> clean the closures that still point to 'hello'... >> Thus, 'hello' is not finalized. >> One possibility is to also clean the closures pointing to 'hello'. >> But now the code is tricky... It's aim was to be simple damned :) >> >> Nicolas >> >> >> here is a corrected version : >> >> >> testFinalizationOfEquals >> "self debug: #testFinalizationOfEquals" >> >> | finalizationProbe o1 o2 >> forAnyTwoEqualObjects >> ofDifferentIdentity >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects >> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted | >> >> finalizationProbe := Set new. >> o1 := 'hello' copy. >> o2 := 'hello' copy. >> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := [o1 = o2]. >> ofDifferentIdentity := [o1 ~~ o2]. >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := [ >> o1 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'first object finalized'. >> o2 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'second object >> finalized']. >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects := [ >> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := ofDifferentIdentity := >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := nil. >> o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. >> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted := [finalizationProbe size = 2]. >> >> self >> assert: forAnyTwoEqualObjects; >> assert: ofDifferentIdentity; >> should: [ >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject value. >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects value. >> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted value]. >> > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>:
> Ah Ah, I found the guilty: > > Set>> do: use 1 to: array size do: [:i | (array at: i) ... > > But array inst. var can be overwritten inside the loop due to #rehash > > OK, OK, I thought I would catch it be redefining do: in WeakKeyDictionary > > do: aBlock > "This needs to be redefined because array inst. var. can eventually > be overwritten during the loop (due to rehash, due to fullCheck) and > make super fail." > > tally = 0 ifTrue: [^ self]. > array do: > [:each | > each ifNotNil: [aBlock value: each]] > Never mind, this was a bad idea anyway, Dictionary do: should only iterate on values > But ARGHH SUPER EVIL, this method does not get executed BECAUSE : > > Dictionary>>associationsDo: aBlock > "Evaluate aBlock for each of the receiver's elements (key/value > associations)." > > super do: aBlock > > ARGHH, it really uses super do:, not my brand new #do: > > This is a good reason I DON'T LIKE INVOKING super WITH A DIFFERENT selector... > > Does not matter, I will just redefine Set>>do:, but that was my evil > minute of the day... > > Nicolas > > 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: >> Oh, now it fails due to WeakIdentityKeyDictionary bug... >> >> Nicolas >> >> 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: >>> I wrote this test pre-closure. >>> The problem with closures is that they are optimized to retain a >>> pointer to the values of outer temporary variable they use when >>> activated. >>> Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject all refer to 'hello' >>> pointed by o1 and its copy pointed by o2. >>> In other words, o1 and o2 are not the single pointers to the String >>> 'hello' and its copy. >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to >>> clean the closures that still point to 'hello'... >>> Thus, 'hello' is not finalized. >>> One possibility is to also clean the closures pointing to 'hello'. >>> But now the code is tricky... It's aim was to be simple damned :) >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> >>> here is a corrected version : >>> >>> >>> testFinalizationOfEquals >>> "self debug: #testFinalizationOfEquals" >>> >>> | finalizationProbe o1 o2 >>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects >>> ofDifferentIdentity >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects >>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted | >>> >>> finalizationProbe := Set new. >>> o1 := 'hello' copy. >>> o2 := 'hello' copy. >>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := [o1 = o2]. >>> ofDifferentIdentity := [o1 ~~ o2]. >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := [ >>> o1 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'first object finalized'. >>> o2 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'second object >>> finalized']. >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects := [ >>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := ofDifferentIdentity := >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := nil. >>> o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. >>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted := [finalizationProbe size = 2]. >>> >>> self >>> assert: forAnyTwoEqualObjects; >>> assert: ofDifferentIdentity; >>> should: [ >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject value. >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects value. >>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted value]. >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I opened http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1839 and
reopened http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1771 All should be fixed in 1.1 now, to be checked in 1.0 Nicolas 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: > 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: >> Ah Ah, I found the guilty: >> >> Set>> do: use 1 to: array size do: [:i | (array at: i) ... >> >> But array inst. var can be overwritten inside the loop due to #rehash >> >> OK, OK, I thought I would catch it be redefining do: in WeakKeyDictionary >> >> do: aBlock >> "This needs to be redefined because array inst. var. can eventually >> be overwritten during the loop (due to rehash, due to fullCheck) and >> make super fail." >> >> tally = 0 ifTrue: [^ self]. >> array do: >> [:each | >> each ifNotNil: [aBlock value: each]] >> > > Never mind, this was a bad idea anyway, Dictionary do: should only > iterate on values > > >> But ARGHH SUPER EVIL, this method does not get executed BECAUSE : >> >> Dictionary>>associationsDo: aBlock >> "Evaluate aBlock for each of the receiver's elements (key/value >> associations)." >> >> super do: aBlock >> >> ARGHH, it really uses super do:, not my brand new #do: >> >> This is a good reason I DON'T LIKE INVOKING super WITH A DIFFERENT selector... >> >> Does not matter, I will just redefine Set>>do:, but that was my evil >> minute of the day... >> >> Nicolas >> >> 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: >>> Oh, now it fails due to WeakIdentityKeyDictionary bug... >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> 2010/1/16 Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]>: >>>> I wrote this test pre-closure. >>>> The problem with closures is that they are optimized to retain a >>>> pointer to the values of outer temporary variable they use when >>>> activated. >>>> Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity >>>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject all refer to 'hello' >>>> pointed by o1 and its copy pointed by o2. >>>> In other words, o1 and o2 are not the single pointers to the String >>>> 'hello' and its copy. >>>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to >>>> clean the closures that still point to 'hello'... >>>> Thus, 'hello' is not finalized. >>>> One possibility is to also clean the closures pointing to 'hello'. >>>> But now the code is tricky... It's aim was to be simple damned :) >>>> >>>> Nicolas >>>> >>>> >>>> here is a corrected version : >>>> >>>> >>>> testFinalizationOfEquals >>>> "self debug: #testFinalizationOfEquals" >>>> >>>> | finalizationProbe o1 o2 >>>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects >>>> ofDifferentIdentity >>>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject >>>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects >>>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted | >>>> >>>> finalizationProbe := Set new. >>>> o1 := 'hello' copy. >>>> o2 := 'hello' copy. >>>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := [o1 = o2]. >>>> ofDifferentIdentity := [o1 ~~ o2]. >>>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := [ >>>> o1 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'first object finalized'. >>>> o2 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: 'second object >>>> finalized']. >>>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects := [ >>>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := ofDifferentIdentity := >>>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := nil. >>>> o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. >>>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted := [finalizationProbe size = 2]. >>>> >>>> self >>>> assert: forAnyTwoEqualObjects; >>>> assert: ofDifferentIdentity; >>>> should: [ >>>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject value. >>>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects value. >>>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted value]. >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Nicolas Cellier
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Nicolas Cellier <[hidden email]> wrote: I wrote this test pre-closure. Not exactly. Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity They are. See below. thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to There are single pointers to o1 and o2 from all the code in the test. o1 and o2 are stored in an indirect temp vector array created at the start of the method. The compiler puts them there because there is an assignment to each after they are closed over:
o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. All the blocks that reference o1 or o2 actually reference the indirect temp vector, so there is only one reference to o1 and o2 from all code in the method, though a single indirect temp vector. So as soon as
o1 := o2 := nil.is executed the only references to o1 & o2 from code have been deleted.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
2010/1/17 Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]>:
> > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Nicolas Cellier > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> I wrote this test pre-closure. >> The problem with closures is that they are optimized to retain a >> pointer to the values of outer temporary variable they use when >> activated. > > Not exactly. > >> >> Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject all refer to 'hello' >> pointed by o1 and its copy pointed by o2. >> In other words, o1 and o2 are not the single pointers to the String >> 'hello' and its copy. > > They are. See below. > >> >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to >> clean the closures that still point to 'hello'... >> Thus, 'hello' is not finalized. >> One possibility is to also clean the closures pointing to 'hello'. >> But now the code is tricky... It's aim was to be simple damned :) > > There are single pointers to o1 and o2 from all the code in the test. o1 > and o2 are stored in an indirect temp vector array created at the start of > the method. The compiler puts them there because there is an assignment to > each after they are closed over: > o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. > All the blocks that reference o1 or o2 actually reference the indirect temp > vector, so there is only one reference to o1 and o2 from all code in the > method, though a single indirect temp vector. So as soon as > o1 := o2 := nil. > is executed the only references to o1 & o2 from code have been deleted. Oh thanks, I get it, the tempVector is the only pointer to 'hello' because it is used both inside and outside blocks. Maybe the WeakKeyIdentityDictionary bug lead me to this false conclusion... Stef, Marcus, don't change this method, just correct issue 1839 (and remove the expected failure) Nicolas >> >> Nicolas >> >> >> here is a corrected version : >> >> >> testFinalizationOfEquals >> "self debug: #testFinalizationOfEquals" >> >> | finalizationProbe o1 o2 >> forAnyTwoEqualObjects >> ofDifferentIdentity >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects >> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted | >> >> finalizationProbe := Set new. >> o1 := 'hello' copy. >> o2 := 'hello' copy. >> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := [o1 = o2]. >> ofDifferentIdentity := [o1 ~~ o2]. >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := [ >> o1 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: >> 'first object finalized'. >> o2 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: >> 'second object >> finalized']. >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects := [ >> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := ofDifferentIdentity := >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := nil. >> o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. >> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted := [finalizationProbe size = >> 2]. >> >> self >> assert: forAnyTwoEqualObjects; >> assert: ofDifferentIdentity; >> should: [ >> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject >> value. >> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects value. >> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted value]. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
ok I will digest all the discussions first
On Jan 17, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote: > 2010/1/17 Eliot Miranda <[hidden email]>: >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Nicolas Cellier >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> I wrote this test pre-closure. >>> The problem with closures is that they are optimized to retain a >>> pointer to the values of outer temporary variable they use when >>> activated. >> >> Not exactly. >> >>> >>> Thus the BlockClosures forAnyTwoEqualObjects ofDifferentIdentity >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject all refer to 'hello' >>> pointed by o1 and its copy pointed by o2. >>> In other words, o1 and o2 are not the single pointers to the String >>> 'hello' and its copy. >> >> They are. See below. >> >>> >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects only clean o1 and o2, but omit to >>> clean the closures that still point to 'hello'... >>> Thus, 'hello' is not finalized. >>> One possibility is to also clean the closures pointing to 'hello'. >>> But now the code is tricky... It's aim was to be simple damned :) >> >> There are single pointers to o1 and o2 from all the code in the test. o1 >> and o2 are stored in an indirect temp vector array created at the start of >> the method. The compiler puts them there because there is an assignment to >> each after they are closed over: >> o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. >> All the blocks that reference o1 or o2 actually reference the indirect temp >> vector, so there is only one reference to o1 and o2 from all code in the >> method, though a single indirect temp vector. So as soon as >> o1 := o2 := nil. >> is executed the only references to o1 & o2 from code have been deleted. > > Oh thanks, I get it, the tempVector is the only pointer to 'hello' > because it is used both inside and outside blocks. > Maybe the WeakKeyIdentityDictionary bug lead me to this false conclusion... > > Stef, Marcus, don't change this method, just correct issue 1839 (and > remove the expected failure) > > Nicolas > >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> >>> here is a corrected version : >>> >>> >>> testFinalizationOfEquals >>> "self debug: #testFinalizationOfEquals" >>> >>> | finalizationProbe o1 o2 >>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects >>> ofDifferentIdentity >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects >>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted | >>> >>> finalizationProbe := Set new. >>> o1 := 'hello' copy. >>> o2 := 'hello' copy. >>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := [o1 = o2]. >>> ofDifferentIdentity := [o1 ~~ o2]. >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := [ >>> o1 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: >>> 'first object finalized'. >>> o2 toFinalizeSend: #add: to: finalizationProbe with: >>> 'second object >>> finalized']. >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects := [ >>> forAnyTwoEqualObjects := ofDifferentIdentity := >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject := nil. >>> o1 := o2 := nil. Smalltalk garbageCollect]. >>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted := [finalizationProbe size = >>> 2]. >>> >>> self >>> assert: forAnyTwoEqualObjects; >>> assert: ofDifferentIdentity; >>> should: [ >>> registeringAnActionAtFinalizationForEachObject >>> value. >>> thenForcingFinalizationOfObjects value. >>> implyBothRegisteredActionsAreExecuted value]. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |