1. Since NativeBoost is now integrated I removed the config
from the ConfigurationBrowser - because it makes no sense to install when it is already in the image :) 2. Please help to test external packages and if they are known to work on Pharo 2.0 please put a copy of ConfigurationOf... also into https://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20.html Do not forget to put a symbolic version for #stable into the metacello config. This way they will show up in and will be loadable from the ConfigurationBrowser. 3. I would like to see a config with a recent Seaside for Pharo 2.0 showing up and putting it into ConfigurationBrowser too so Seaside is easily loadable right from Pharo 2.0. It loads well on the BETA when one uses: https://github.com/renggli/builder/blob/master/scripts/seaside31-pharo2.st and Gofer new squeaksource: 'ZincHTTPComponents'; "package: 'Zinc-HTTP';" package: 'Zinc-Seaside'; load. The only thing I've hit was some deprecation stuff #includesSubString: vs. includesSubstring: but I did not check all seaside tests. @Dale: whats the state of a Seaside config for Pharo 2.0? Thanks T. |
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
Do people only use the ConfigurationBrowser for initial installing of the packages, or does it get used for when the package is updated? If the former, this makes a lot of sense; if the later, you might want to rethink removing it.
-Chris
|
In reply to this post by Torsten Bergmann
I think the Seaside configs in this issue should work in Pharo 2, for both Seaside 3.0.7 and 3.1 (which is not released) but I'm not positive and plan to spend some time raising my confidence this weekend. http://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=748 |
In reply to this post by cbc
On 6 December 2012 22:34, Chris Cunningham <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Do people only use the ConfigurationBrowser for initial installing of the > packages, or does it get used for when the package is updated? If the > former, this makes a lot of sense; if the later, you might want to rethink > removing it. Since integration, the updates will be automatically handled by pharo team. so you just need to click 'update' button. Using non-stable, non-blessed, bleeding-edge version of config is another story :) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko. |
Hi,
NB is in image, yes... but not all. That means people can still want to load special chunks of it, that will not be around in regular images (for instance Examples, ObjC extension, etc.) IMO, configuration still has sense and I wouldn't remove it from Configurations Browser. Esteban On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Igor Stasenko <[hidden email]> wrote: > On 6 December 2012 22:34, Chris Cunningham <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Do people only use the ConfigurationBrowser for initial installing of the >> packages, or does it get used for when the package is updated? If the >> former, this makes a lot of sense; if the later, you might want to rethink >> removing it. > > Since integration, the updates will be automatically handled by pharo team. > so you just need to click 'update' button. > Using non-stable, non-blessed, bleeding-edge version of config is > another story :) > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |