I am running the Pharo 2.0 beta, and I am getting a lot of System Error Handling Failed events. Is this simply a product of the beta status, or have I somehow enabled some kind of debug switch?
For example, in a workspace I execute a doit on: fd := FileDialogWindow new. fn := fd openInWorld. When I click OK in the dialog box, I get the System Error screen. On other occasions I get the screen, press space to continue, then I get the debug window, and when attempting to debug it bounces me back to the System Error screen.
Normal behaviour for the beta, or operator error on my part? Cheers Andy |
that is/was a bug:
https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6608 looks like it is still there in a newer image! On 2013-01-23, at 02:05, Andy Burnett <[hidden email]> wrote: > I am running the Pharo 2.0 beta, and I am getting a lot of System Error > Handling Failed events. Is this simply a product of the beta status, or > have I somehow enabled some kind of debug switch? > > For example, in a workspace I execute a doit on: > > fd := FileDialogWindow new. > fn := fd openInWorld. > > When I click OK in the dialog box, I get the System Error screen. On other > occasions I get the screen, press space to continue, then I get the debug > window, and when attempting to debug it bounces me back to the System Error > screen. > > Normal behaviour for the beta, or operator error on my part? > > Cheers > Andy |
I really think that for the process of polishing 2.0 from beta to release we need a new label for issues.
Bugs like the one below are really important, they might be silly or easy to fix, but they leave a bad impression. We want as many people as possible to help, but UX failures like this will scare away many users, most won't be as helpful as Andy to even report the issue. We as developers know that 2.0 is OK because we use it every day, but occasional users who just try 2.0 for the first time can't know that. So not HorribleErrorBlockingEverything but maybe HorribleUXQualityBugScaringAwayNormalPeople as label ? Sven On 23 Jan 2013, at 02:43, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote: > that is/was a bug: > > https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6608 > > looks like it is still there in a newer image! > > On 2013-01-23, at 02:05, Andy Burnett <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I am running the Pharo 2.0 beta, and I am getting a lot of System Error >> Handling Failed events. Is this simply a product of the beta status, or >> have I somehow enabled some kind of debug switch? >> >> For example, in a workspace I execute a doit on: >> >> fd := FileDialogWindow new. >> fn := fd openInWorld. >> >> When I click OK in the dialog box, I get the System Error screen. On other >> occasions I get the screen, press space to continue, then I get the debug >> window, and when attempting to debug it bounces me back to the System Error >> screen. >> >> Normal behaviour for the beta, or operator error on my part? >> >> Cheers >> Andy -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill |
On 2013-01-23, at 10:52, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: > I really think that for the process of polishing 2.0 from beta to release we need a new label for issues. > > Bugs like the one below are really important, they might be silly or easy to fix, but they leave a bad impression. We want as many people as possible to help, but UX failures like this will scare away many users, most won't be as helpful as Andy to even report the issue. We as developers know that 2.0 is OK because we use it every day, but occasional users who just try 2.0 for the first time can't know that. Indeed! > So not HorribleErrorBlockingEverything but maybe HorribleUXQualityBugScaringAwayNormalPeople as label ? => Pharo20QC ;) > Sven > > On 23 Jan 2013, at 02:43, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> that is/was a bug: >> >> https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6608 >> >> looks like it is still there in a newer image! >> >> On 2013-01-23, at 02:05, Andy Burnett <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> I am running the Pharo 2.0 beta, and I am getting a lot of System Error >>> Handling Failed events. Is this simply a product of the beta status, or >>> have I somehow enabled some kind of debug switch? >>> >>> For example, in a workspace I execute a doit on: >>> >>> fd := FileDialogWindow new. >>> fn := fd openInWorld. >>> >>> When I click OK in the dialog box, I get the System Error screen. On other >>> occasions I get the screen, press space to continue, then I get the debug >>> window, and when attempting to debug it bounces me back to the System Error >>> screen. >>> >>> Normal behaviour for the beta, or operator error on my part? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Andy > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > http://stfx.eu > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > > |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
On Jan 23, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote: > I really think that for the process of polishing 2.0 from beta to release we need a new label for issues. > > Bugs like the one below are really important, they might be silly or easy to fix, but they leave a bad impression. We want as many people as possible to help, but UX failures like this will scare away many users, most won't be as helpful as Andy to even report the issue. We as developers know that 2.0 is OK because we use it every day, but occasional users who just try 2.0 for the first time can't know that. > > So not HorribleErrorBlockingEverything but maybe HorribleUXQualityBugScaringAwayNormalPeople as label ? > :-) yes. Marcus |
In reply to this post by Camillo Bruni-3
camillo may be this was because we had this bug in the method cache. So the extensions may be lost.
Stef On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote: > that is/was a bug: > > https://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6608 > > looks like it is still there in a newer image! > > On 2013-01-23, at 02:05, Andy Burnett <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I am running the Pharo 2.0 beta, and I am getting a lot of System Error >> Handling Failed events. Is this simply a product of the beta status, or >> have I somehow enabled some kind of debug switch? >> >> For example, in a workspace I execute a doit on: >> >> fd := FileDialogWindow new. >> fn := fd openInWorld. >> >> When I click OK in the dialog box, I get the System Error screen. On other >> occasions I get the screen, press space to continue, then I get the debug >> window, and when attempting to debug it bounces me back to the System Error >> screen. >> >> Normal behaviour for the beta, or operator error on my part? >> >> Cheers >> Andy > > |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Camillo Bruni-3
Since HorribleXxx is unqualified as to the release, why not simply QualityControl? I've added it as a status to google code: "QualityControl = Leave a bad impression for users, even if easy or silly to fix"
Cheers,
Sean |
On 23 Jan 2013, at 14:58, "Sean P. DeNigris" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Camillo Bruni-3 wrote >> Indeed! >> >>> So not HorribleErrorBlockingEverything but maybe >>> HorribleUXQualityBugScaringAwayNormalPeople as label ? >> >> => Pharo20QC ;) > > Since HorribleXxx is unqualified as to the release, why not simply > QualityControl? > > I've added it as a status to google code: "QualityControl = Leave a bad > impression for users, even if easy or silly to fix" Yeah, but the label should also convey some sense of urgency. I also think that UX is an element: it relates to what users (and we too BTW) encounter in the IDE, blocking them (us) from doing normal work. Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe http://stfx.eu Smalltalk is the Red Pill |
Administrator
|
PoorUserExperience? or suggestions...
Cheers,
Sean |
Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
> Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote > >> Yeah, but the label should also convey some sense of urgency. >> >> I also think that UX is an element: it relates to what users (and we too >> BTW) encounter in the IDE, blocking them (us) from doing normal work. >> > > PoorUserExperience? or suggestions... > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-2-0-System-Error-Handling-Failed-tp4664742p4664885.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > |
Administrator
|
I actually like that a lot. If there are no objections, I'll change it to that. Also, this and HorribleXyz should be issue types, not statuses; I'll fix that too...
Cheers,
Sean |
In reply to this post by Sven Van Caekenberghe-2
On 23 January 2013 10:52, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[hidden email]> wrote:
Seriously, you think chaning the label will help? Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net |
Will it for sure make it worse? If not then who cares if he changed it or not. It's him donating his time.
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by mmimica
Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_determinism I believe that everything counts. If nothing else, a sense of order and beauty will keep me inspired to keep playing and contributing.
Cheers,
Sean |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Sean P. DeNigris
In the issue tracker: "Status:QualityControl" is now "Type:FirstImpressionsCount" and "Status:HorribleErrorBlockingEverything" is now a type (instead of a status) with the same name as before I did this because these things are not really statuses and then, for example if the status was HorribleErrorBlockingEverything, we either won't know when it's FixReviewNeeded, or it will be changed to that and maybe we forget how horrible it is :) All existing issues have been migrated to the new tags HTH, Sean
Cheers,
Sean |
nice! :)
On 2013-01-30, at 02:40, "Sean P. DeNigris" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Sean P. DeNigris wrote >> >> Ben Coman wrote >>> FirstImpressionsCount :) >> I actually like that a lot. If there are no objections, I'll change it to >> that. Also, this and HorribleXyz should be issue types, not statuses; I'll >> fix that too... > > In the issue tracker: > "Status:QualityControl" is now "Type:FirstImpressionsCount" > and > "Status:HorribleErrorBlockingEverything" is now a type (instead of a status) > with the same name as before > > I did this because these things are not really statuses and then, for > example if the status was HorribleErrorBlockingEverything, we either won't > know when it's FixReviewNeeded, or it will be changed to that and maybe we > forget how horrible it is :) > > All existing issues have been migrated to the new tags > > HTH, > Sean > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-2-0-System-Error-Handling-Failed-tp4664742p4666477.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |