|
|
The Link to 236 points to something else that is not #at:at:
Why are new sub dictionaries instansiated as a normal Dictionary instead of species/class?
I would expect a sub-Dictionary be of the same class as its parent.
Here is a test case:
----------
| dct key1 key2 subDct |
dct := IdentityDictionary new.
key1 := 'a'.
key2 := key1 copy.
dct
at: #a at: key1 put: 1;
at: #a at: key2 put: 2.
subDct := dct at: #a.
TestCase new
assert: subDct size equals: 2;
assert: (subDct at: key1) equals: 1;
assert: (subDct at: key2) equals: 2
----------
Best regards,
Henrik
Fra: Pharo-dev <[hidden email]> på vegne av Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]>
Sendt: 3. september 2017 15:56:36
Til: Pharo Development List
Emne: [Pharo-dev] [ Pharo 70 ] Build 83 PR 236 introduce-at-at-in-dictionary
|
Locked
