Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
27 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

keith1y
Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
> So, please correct me if I am wrong:
>
> 1) The most secure cross-fork way to update Monticello for clean images is
>
> HTTPSocket httpFileIn: 'ftp.squeak.org/3.11/scripts/LPF.st
> <http://ftp.squeak.org/3.11/scripts/LPF.st>'.
that method is not supported in older squeaks.
> 2) Installer is necessary to update Monticello to 1.5 or 1.6
>
> 3) It is well-know that packages like OmniBrowser doesn't load after
> this update is done? (at least in Squeak images)
>
Thats possibly a bug in OB, it calls withSubclassesDo: on a trait.

Its not well known to me, fixing the above I can generate the dev images

> See http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7369
If other patches are required, the monticello scripts for loading into
Pharo are in InstallerScripts, and you are welcome to maintain them there

Keith


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Douglas Brebner
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
> Ok we will fix that for 1.0
> right now we are not even in beta.
>
>  
As a minor point, running Pharo on a network drive is *horrifically*
slow so don't do that :)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Adrian Lienhard
Can you elaborate on what is slow?
Is this only Pharo or also Squeak?

Adrian

On Jul 17, 2009, at 01:07 , Douglas Brebner wrote:

> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>> Ok we will fix that for 1.0
>> right now we are not even in beta.
>>
>>
> As a minor point, running Pharo on a network drive is *horrifically*
> slow so don't do that :)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Douglas Brebner
Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Can you elaborate on what is slow?
> Is this only Pharo or also Squeak?
>
>  
Anything that hits the changes file such as compiling or many MC operations.
e.g. When you see the a popup saying "Snapshotting" it's time to go get
something to eat.
And yes, it affects Squeak too.

The speed difference between running it on a local hard drive and a
remote one is incredible.

> Adrian
>
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 01:07 , Douglas Brebner wrote:
>
>  
>> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>    
>>> Ok we will fix that for 1.0
>>> right now we are not even in beta.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>> As a minor point, running Pharo on a network drive is *horrifically*
>> slow so don't do that :)
>>    


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Michael Rueger-6
Douglas Brebner wrote:

> Anything that hits the changes file such as compiling or many MC operations.
> e.g. When you see the a popup saying "Snapshotting" it's time to go get
> something to eat.
> And yes, it affects Squeak too.

Not only Squeak. Ever tried to open an OpenOffice document from a
network drive?

Michael

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Stéphane Ducasse
In reply to this post by Douglas Brebner
I imagine that the snapshotting goes over the SourceFiles

I also know that nicolas proposed a speed up of latin files.

Stef
On Jul 17, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Douglas Brebner wrote:

> Adrian Lienhard wrote:
>> Can you elaborate on what is slow?
>> Is this only Pharo or also Squeak?
>>
>>
> Anything that hits the changes file such as compiling or many MC  
> operations.
> e.g. When you see the a popup saying "Snapshotting" it's time to go  
> get
> something to eat.
> And yes, it affects Squeak too.
>
> The speed difference between running it on a local hard drive and a
> remote one is incredible.
>> Adrian
>>
>> On Jul 17, 2009, at 01:07 , Douglas Brebner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok we will fix that for 1.0
>>>> right now we are not even in beta.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> As a minor point, running Pharo on a network drive is *horrifically*
>>> slow so don't do that :)
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Schwab,Wilhelm K
In reply to this post by Douglas Brebner
Speed is good, more speed is better.  But my experience is that network drives are convenient (when they work), and otherwise slow and unreliable.  Running a Smalltalk system over one is not something I would want to do for fear of losing the connection and therefore my work.  Just my 2 asCents.  Of course, it might be an interesting test case to profile to find a bottleneck.

Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Douglas Brebner
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 4:23 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Pharo-Dev/web Image slowness

Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Can you elaborate on what is slow?
> Is this only Pharo or also Squeak?
>
>  
Anything that hits the changes file such as compiling or many MC operations.
e.g. When you see the a popup saying "Snapshotting" it's time to go get something to eat.
And yes, it affects Squeak too.

The speed difference between running it on a local hard drive and a remote one is incredible.

> Adrian
>
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 01:07 , Douglas Brebner wrote:
>
>  
>> Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>>    
>>> Ok we will fix that for 1.0
>>> right now we are not even in beta.
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>> As a minor point, running Pharo on a network drive is *horrifically*
>> slow so don't do that :)
>>    


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
12