Smalltalk › Pharo › Pharo Smalltalk Developers

Pharo Process question

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

6 messages Options

Stephane Ducasse-3

Pharo Process question

Hi

are the pending PR reevaluated when one PR is integrated?

Stef

EstebanLM

Re: Pharo Process question

> On 24 Oct 2017, at 21:47, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> are the pending PR reevaluated when one PR is integrated?

it was, but Guille disabled it because it was killing the server.
when we jump to tonel we can re-evaluate the problem :)

Esteban

>
> Stef
>

Guillermo Polito

Re: Pharo Process question

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 24 Oct 2017, at 21:47, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> are the pending PR reevaluated when one PR is integrated?

Unfortunately not on every integration... We should do it that way but there are some problems with Jenkins allocating space in the master machine.

Christophe was telling me he would contact the people from jenkins to see if there is a solution for that.

it was, but Guille disabled it because it was killing the server.
when we jump to tonel we can re-evaluate the problem :)

Esteban

>
> Stef
>

Guille Polito

Research Engineer

Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille

CRIStAL - UMR 9189

French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr

Web: http://guillep.github.io

Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13

Stephane Ducasse-3

Re: Pharo Process question

Thanks guys.

Let us move to tonel :)

So I have to watch out then before pushing the button ;)

Stef

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 24 Oct 2017, at 21:47, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> are the pending PR reevaluated when one PR is integrated?

Unfortunately not on every integration... We should do it that way but there are some problems with Jenkins allocating space in the master machine.

Christophe was telling me he would contact the people from jenkins to see if there is a solution for that.

it was, but Guille disabled it because it was killing the server.
when we jump to tonel we can re-evaluate the problem :)

Esteban

>
> Stef
>

--

Guille Polito
Research Engineer
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189

French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr

Web: http://guillep.github.io

Phone: <a href="tel:+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013" value="+33652706613" target="_blank">+33 06 52 70 66 13

NorbertHartl

Re: Pharo Process question

But don't complain for the coming weeks about things not working ;)

Norbert

Am 25.10.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:

Thanks guys.
Let us move to tonel :)
So I have to watch out then before pushing the button ;)
Stef

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 24 Oct 2017, at 21:47, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> are the pending PR reevaluated when one PR is integrated?

Unfortunately not on every integration... We should do it that way but there are some problems with Jenkins allocating space in the master machine.

Christophe was telling me he would contact the people from jenkins to see if there is a solution for that.

it was, but Guille disabled it because it was killing the server.
when we jump to tonel we can re-evaluate the problem :)

Esteban

>
> Stef
>

--

Guille Polito
Research Engineer

Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189
French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr

Web: http://guillep.github.io
Phone: <a href="tel:+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013" value="+33652706613" target="_blank" class="">+33 06 52 70 66 13

Stephane Ducasse-3

Re: Pharo Process question

Well I would dream to give my superpower to attract bugs to anybody else.

Because sometimes this is tiring.

Yesterday a class comment changes of mine broke our jenkins process. Do not ask me why and how it is possible.

But it did.

Stef

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Norbert Hartl <[hidden email]> wrote:

But don't complain for the coming weeks about things not working ;)

Norbert

Am 25.10.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]>:

Thanks guys.
Let us move to tonel :)
So I have to watch out then before pushing the button ;)
Stef

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Guillermo Polito <[hidden email]> wrote:

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 24 Oct 2017, at 21:47, Stephane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> are the pending PR reevaluated when one PR is integrated?

Unfortunately not on every integration... We should do it that way but there are some problems with Jenkins allocating space in the master machine.

Christophe was telling me he would contact the people from jenkins to see if there is a solution for that.

it was, but Guille disabled it because it was killing the server.
when we jump to tonel we can re-evaluate the problem :)

Esteban

>
> Stef
>

--

Guille Polito
Research Engineer

Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189
French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr

Web: http://guillep.github.io
Phone: <a href="tel:+33%206%2052%2070%2066%2013" value="+33652706613" target="_blank">+33 06 52 70 66 13