Pharo on Stackexchange
Locked
12
12
 
|
+1
> Why not simply use stackoverflow and tag your questions with "pharo"? > > frank > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Frank Shearar-3
2012/5/15 Frank Shearar <[hidden email]>:
> On 15 May 2012 12:23, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On May 15, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Frank Shearar wrote: >> >>> On 15 May 2012 12:10, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> With the dev mailing list slowly getting out of control ;) we should think of >>>>> means of communication with the masses! >>>>> >>>>> I created stackexchange proposal which needs YOUR support: >>>>> >>>>> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/40717/pharo?referrer=gXC4FWspxSudZ2cQVVgbgQ2 >>>>> >>>>> we need now: >>>>> - 60 Followers >>>>> - 40 questions with some answers! >>>>> >>>> It seems that this will not work: someone is tagging all questions as >>>> "can be asked on Stackoverflow" >>>> and requests to close the area. >>>> >>>> So I think we will have to install our own thing instead. >>> >>> If what you want is something other than a QA site, absolutely. >>> >>> If you want a QA place, I don't see why people can't just use SO: >>> there are already 113 questions tagged "pharo" there, and all people >>> need do is... just ask your question there. It's one more thing you >>> don't need to write/install/maintain, and one LESS thing for you to >>> track: lists, RSS feeds, newsgroups, QA sites, ... >> >> >> I did not have an account on StackOverflow until 1 hour ago. >> It's one more thing in itself, and I don't see how a big mess of questions >> helps of all topics in the world will help us. >> >> We need somethign focussed. > > http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/pharo would probably be exactly > what you'd want, possibly with > http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/smalltalk just to catch non-Pharo > questions that could be answered from a Pharo perspective. > > But yes, I guess there is a cost in that you need an SO account to ask > questions. Having paid that cost long ago, I didn't think about that. > > frank You get a google account, facebook, or something, then the cost is approximately 4 clicks in your favourite web browser Nicolas >> >> Marcus >> >> >> -- >> Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de >> >> > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
I perceive SO answers as rather high-quality.
Maybe it's just due to the rating, but I recommend this site professionally. Of course, you may think that Smalltalk already implies high-quality, and that the community is too small for having reliable rating... Nonetheless I'd say +1 for SO Nicolas 2012/5/15 Marcus Denker <[hidden email]>: > > On May 15, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Frank Shearar wrote: >>> >>> I did not have an account on StackOverflow until 1 hour ago. >>> It's one more thing in itself, and I don't see how a big mess of questions >>> helps of all topics in the world will help us. >>> >>> We need somethign focussed. >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/pharo would probably be exactly >> what you'd want, possibly with >> http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/smalltalk just to catch non-Pharo >> questions that could be answered from a Pharo perspective. >> >> But yes, I guess there is a cost in that you need an SO account to ask >> questions. Having paid that cost long ago, I didn't think about that. >> > To me it feels like if every open source project would just use one > Bug tracker because there are tags... while I already thing that > I want sub-projects on the current one. > > I personally don't think that tagging subsumes grouping. > > Marcus > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > > |
|
|
In reply to this post by Frank Shearar-3
On 15 May 2012 13:49, Frank Shearar <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 15 May 2012 12:23, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> On May 15, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Frank Shearar wrote: >> >>> On 15 May 2012 12:10, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Camillo Bruni <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>>> With the dev mailing list slowly getting out of control ;) we should think of >>>>> means of communication with the masses! >>>>> >>>>> I created stackexchange proposal which needs YOUR support: >>>>> >>>>> http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/40717/pharo?referrer=gXC4FWspxSudZ2cQVVgbgQ2 >>>>> >>>>> we need now: >>>>> - 60 Followers >>>>> - 40 questions with some answers! >>>>> >>>> It seems that this will not work: someone is tagging all questions as >>>> "can be asked on Stackoverflow" >>>> and requests to close the area. >>>> >>>> So I think we will have to install our own thing instead. >>> >>> If what you want is something other than a QA site, absolutely. >>> >>> If you want a QA place, I don't see why people can't just use SO: >>> there are already 113 questions tagged "pharo" there, and all people >>> need do is... just ask your question there. It's one more thing you >>> don't need to write/install/maintain, and one LESS thing for you to >>> track: lists, RSS feeds, newsgroups, QA sites, ... >> >> >> I did not have an account on StackOverflow until 1 hour ago. >> It's one more thing in itself, and I don't see how a big mess of questions >> helps of all topics in the world will help us. >> >> We need somethign focussed. > > http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/pharo would probably be exactly > what you'd want, possibly with > http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/smalltalk just to catch non-Pharo > questions that could be answered from a Pharo perspective. > > But yes, I guess there is a cost in that you need an SO account to ask > questions. Having paid that cost long ago, I didn't think about that. SO account? what is it? I authorized with OpenID. So registering is few clicks. I think we don't need separate site. SO is just fine. I added 'smalltalk' tag into my favorites, and i get notified by mail every time there's a new question -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko. |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |