PharoKernel #12217
Locked
 
|
Hi,
I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties: - better scripts processing - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded packages - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included), however it needs some next fixes to work properly - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately. If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore. Cheers, -- Pavel |
|
|
On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties: > - better scripts processing > - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded packages > - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included), > however it needs some next fixes to work properly > - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive > > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip > > The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split > Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately. Yes and that they follow the pattern > If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple > to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore. Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration process to it. We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not scale) but it requires to have a good alternative. Stef |
|
|
Hi,
a good new, Gofer works fine for me :-) ...and test results for kernel, network, Monticello and Gofer are quite good. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties: >> - better scripts processing >> - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded packages >> - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included), >> however it needs some next fixes to work properly >> - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive >> >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip >> >> The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split >> Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately. > > Yes > and that they follow the pattern > >> If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple >> to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore. > > Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration process to it. > We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not scale) but it requires to have a good alternative. Well, Configurations were always suspicious to me - they do not even share a common superclass :-) -- Pavel > > Stef > |
|
|
So....soon we will be able to prepare a Seaside 30 Pharo Kernel image? :):):):):):)
Since we have Monticello.... great!! On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, |
|
|
In fact the Seaside 3 Configuration was one of the first things I
tested :-) Unfortunatelly I was not successful however it looked promissing, -- Pavel On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <[hidden email]> wrote: > So....soon we will be able to prepare a Seaside 30 Pharo Kernel image? > :):):):):):) > > Since we have Monticello.... great!! > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Krivanek <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> a good new, Gofer works fine for me :-) >> ...and test results for kernel, network, Monticello and Gofer are quite >> good. >> >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >> > >> > On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I uploaded a new version of PharoKernel. It has several new properties: >> >> - better scripts processing >> >> - separate dictionaries for images, scripts, reports and downloaded >> >> packages >> >> - It is able to load Network, Monticello and Gopher (image included), >> >> however it needs some next fixes to work properly >> >> - ImageMap and ImageGraph included in the archive >> >> >> >> >> >> https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/27699/PharoKernel-1.2-12217.zip >> >> >> >> The most important thing that should be done in Pharo is to split >> >> Tests package to be able to load Monticello tests separately. >> > >> > Yes >> > and that they follow the pattern >> > >> >> If Monticello and Gofer will work well then it should be quite simple >> >> to prepare PharoCore Configuration to load the rest of PharoCore. >> > >> > Yes this is the vision but now our problem is to port our integration >> > process to it. >> > We will certainly changes it anyway because it slows us down (does not >> > scale) but it requires to have a good alternative. >> >> Well, Configurations were always suspicious to me - they do not even >> share a common superclass :-) >> >> -- Pavel >> >> > >> > Stef >> > >> > > |
«
Return to Pharo Smalltalk Developers
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |