On Mar 9, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 18:53, stephane ducasse
> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Thanks thanks thanks thanks for a refresh on that!
>> Thanks!
>
> Stef, instead of thanking five times, why don't you try to do
> something constructive?
do you think that pharo is not constructive enough :)
> The GPLv3 includes a system of granting Additional Permissions. This
> system has already been used by GCC and Autoconf. Let's develop a set
> of additional permissions that we believe do not "taint" the whole
> image. I placed a starting point at
>
http://smalltalk.gnu.org/blog/bonzinip/towards-permissive-copyleft-license-dynamic-languages>
> [To those that followed the entire thread: this is totally independent
> of how any GSoC code related to GNU Smalltalk will be licensed].
Paolo what I learned is that I want to be as far as possible from license problems.
So I avoid them simply
either I would do GPL/dual licensing to get company pay to get it.
or MIT because I understand it.
I know this is naive but I hate licenses! They fucked up our lives.
Stef
_______________________________________________
help-smalltalk mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk