Smalltalk › Frameworks & Tools › Moose

Porting DSM into Roassal. Question about MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle:

_‹ Previous Topic Next Topic _›

Classic

List

Threaded

6 messages Options

Juraj Kubelka-5

Porting DSM into Roassal. Question about MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle:

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

jannik laval

Re: Porting DSM into Roassal. Question about MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle:

Hi,

Really cool !

On May 3, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juraj Kubelka <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I am almost done with porting DSM views into Roassal. There is several times (for example: NumberColoredDSM>>contentOfSimplyCell:for:with:out:) used method MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle: which is not supported by Roassal.
>
> Just for sure: Is it obligatory for this views? Should I implement this feature in Roassal?

The model should be changed to be more flexible, taking more than packages… So, I think it is not necessary to reimplement it as it is, but making a better model beside DSM.

>
> Thanks,
> Jura

Cheers,
Jannik

> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

Juraj Kubelka-5

Re: Porting DSM into Roassal. Question about MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle:

CONTENTS DELETED

The author has deleted this message.

jannik laval

Re: Porting DSM into Roassal. Question about MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle:

On May 3, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Juraj Kubelka <[hidden email]> wrote:

OK, thank you. Actually I am not reimplementing it. My first goal is to remove Mondrian in the simplest and acceptable way it is possible. Afterwards I can do better tools.

Nice !

Hope to see DSM implemented in Roassal soon :)

Jannik

Cheers,
Jura

2013/5/3 jannik.laval <[hidden email]>
Hi,

Really cool !

On May 3, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juraj Kubelka <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I am almost done with porting DSM views into Roassal. There is several times (for example: NumberColoredDSM>>contentOfSimplyCell:for:with:out:) used method MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle: which is not supported by Roassal.
>
> Just for sure: Is it obligatory for this views? Should I implement this feature in Roassal?

The model should be changed to be more flexible, taking more than packages… So, I think it is not necessary to reimplement it as it is, but making a better model beside DSM.

>
> Thanks,
> Jura

Cheers,
Jannik

> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

abergel

Re: Porting DSM into Roassal. Question about MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle:

Thanks Jannik!

A general question: are there exiting things to do with Dsm? If you have to redo your phd, would you take a different approach? If yes, which ones?

Alexandre

Le 4 mai 2013 à 15:39, "jannik.laval" <[hidden email]> a écrit :

On May 3, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Juraj Kubelka <[hidden email]> wrote:

OK, thank you. Actually I am not reimplementing it. My first goal is to remove Mondrian in the simplest and acceptable way it is possible. Afterwards I can do better tools.

Nice !
Hope to see DSM implemented in Roassal soon :)

Jannik

Cheers,
Jura

2013/5/3 jannik.laval <[hidden email]>
Hi,

Really cool !

On May 3, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juraj Kubelka <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I am almost done with porting DSM views into Roassal. There is several times (for example: NumberColoredDSM>>contentOfSimplyCell:for:with:out:) used method MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle: which is not supported by Roassal.
>
> Just for sure: Is it obligatory for this views? Should I implement this feature in Roassal?

The model should be changed to be more flexible, taking more than packages… So, I think it is not necessary to reimplement it as it is, but making a better model beside DSM.

>
> Thanks,
> Jura

Cheers,
Jannik

> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

jannik laval

Re: Porting DSM into Roassal. Question about MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle:

Hi Alex,

In fact DSM is two things: an algorithm and a visualization.

About DSM I think that the visualization have to be more modular. It should take a kind of DSMObject with properties that we can display.

About the principle of DSM, i think that the visualization could be better with for example animation for zooming...

Now, what is interesting to do, that is not finished is to show the problems but mainly an idea to resolve the problem.

It is a small answer, but we could discuss more in detail about your problematics, if you want.

Jannik

2013/5/6 Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]>

Thanks Jannik!

A general question: are there exiting things to do with Dsm? If you have to redo your phd, would you take a different approach? If yes, which ones?

Alexandre

Le 4 mai 2013 à 15:39, "jannik.laval" <[hidden email]> a écrit :

On May 3, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Juraj Kubelka <[hidden email]> wrote:

OK, thank you. Actually I am not reimplementing it. My first goal is to remove Mondrian in the simplest and acceptable way it is possible. Afterwards I can do better tools.

Nice !
Hope to see DSM implemented in Roassal soon :)

Jannik

Cheers,
Jura

2013/5/3 jannik.laval <[hidden email]>
Hi,

Really cool !

On May 3, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Juraj Kubelka <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I am almost done with porting DSM views into Roassal. There is several times (for example: NumberColoredDSM>>contentOfSimplyCell:for:with:out:) used method MOFilledStyle>>borderStyle: which is not supported by Roassal.
>
> Just for sure: Is it obligatory for this views? Should I implement this feature in Roassal?

The model should be changed to be more flexible, taking more than packages… So, I think it is not necessary to reimplement it as it is, but making a better model beside DSM.

>
> Thanks,
> Jura

Cheers,
Jannik

> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

~~Dr. Jannik Laval~~
École des Mines de Douai
Enseignant-chercheur
http://www.jannik-laval.eu

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev