I had a recent request to port the SUnit Browser
(http://www.odellsoft.com/sunitbrowser) from Dolphin 4.0 to the free version of Dolphin 2.1. Having been a late convert to Dolphin, can anyone comment in a general sense whether this port will be difficult? The SUnit Browser has a model that executes the functionality of the browser. This model has no GUI dependencies and it ports pretty easily - I used SIF to port it from VisualAge. However, the GUI part is unique to each platform. So the real question becomes whether I can back port the GUI from 4.0 to 2.1 or whether it is essentially a do-over on the GUI. Thanks in advance for any advice - jlo |
Jeffrey,
> I had a recent request to port the SUnit Browser > (http://www.odellsoft.com/sunitbrowser) from Dolphin 4.0 to the free version > of Dolphin 2.1. Having been a late convert to Dolphin, can anyone comment > in a general sense whether this port will be difficult? > > The SUnit Browser has a model that executes the functionality of the > browser. This model has no GUI dependencies and it ports pretty easily - I > used SIF to port it from VisualAge. However, the GUI part is unique to each > platform. So the real question becomes whether I can back port the GUI from > 4.0 to 2.1 or whether it is essentially a do-over on the GUI. ListModel and ChoicePresenter have improved significantly in their support for identity vs. equality. There will no doubt be other snags due to things that have been long-since fixed. I'll admit that there's a part of me that would quote an hourly rate for the effort :) D4 is a great product, and very affordable, especially at the low end. Having better third-party support for D4 than the free version might encourage some folks to pony up, which is good for OA and therefore for all of us. Just my $0.02 on the subject, and not at all meant to tell you what to do. Have a good one, Bill -- Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. [hidden email] |
I too had second thoughts about the port, but it was a request from a
university in Uruguay that was using Dolphin Smalltalk 2.1 for a class. Prior to that request, I had no intention of looking at 2.1. Since it meant introducing more folks to Smalltalk, I felt it might be worthwhile if it wasn't too great an effort. Perhaps Andy or Blair will want the contact that e-mailed the request to me as they might offer them an educational deal. As far as the value and affordability of 4.0, I agree wholeheartedly! jlo "Bill Schwab" <[hidden email]> wrote in message news:9lgbaa$9bcb0$[hidden email]... > Jeffrey, > > > I had a recent request to port the SUnit Browser > > (http://www.odellsoft.com/sunitbrowser) from Dolphin 4.0 to the free > version > > of Dolphin 2.1. Having been a late convert to Dolphin, can anyone comment > > in a general sense whether this port will be difficult? > > > > The SUnit Browser has a model that executes the functionality of the > > browser. This model has no GUI dependencies and it ports pretty easily - > I > > used SIF to port it from VisualAge. However, the GUI part is unique to > each > > platform. So the real question becomes whether I can back port the GUI > from > > 4.0 to 2.1 or whether it is essentially a do-over on the GUI. > > ListModel and ChoicePresenter have improved significantly in their support > for identity vs. equality. There will no doubt be other snags due to things > that have been long-since fixed. > > I'll admit that there's a part of me that would quote an hourly rate for the > effort :) D4 is a great product, and very affordable, especially at the > low end. Having better third-party support for D4 than the free version > might encourage some folks to pony up, which is good for OA and therefore > for all of us. Just my $0.02 on the subject, and not at all meant to tell > you what to do. > > Have a good one, > > Bill > > -- > Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. > [hidden email] > > > |
Jeffrey,
> I too had second thoughts about the port, but it was a request from a > university in Uruguay that was using Dolphin Smalltalk 2.1 for a class. That's getting to be a pretty good reason to do it; but, it might also be an excellent project for a graduate student (if they have a grad school) or even a couple of motivated students in the class. You might simply file out the code and leave the details to them. > Prior to that request, I had no intention of looking at 2.1. Since it meant > introducing more folks to Smalltalk, I felt it might be worthwhile if it > wasn't too great an effort. Perhaps Andy or Blair will want the contact > that e-mailed the request to me as they might offer them an educational > deal. The deal (unless I found an obsolete page) is: http://www.object-arts.com/EducationalPricing.htm AFAIK, this is not linked - I remembered there was a page describing it and guessed the URL. Have a good one, Bill -- Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. [hidden email] |
Bill,
> The deal (unless I found an obsolete page) is: > > http://www.object-arts.com/EducationalPricing.htm > > AFAIK, this is not linked - I remembered there was a page describing it and > guessed the URL. We are no longer offering this Educational Pricing deal. This link (although the page is still present) shouldn't be referenced from anywhere. Existing registrations under the educational scheme are still valid, however. Best Regards Andy Bower Dolphin Support http://www.object-arts.com/Support.htm Not all Addictions are Bad for you http://www.object-arts.com/Addiction.htm |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |