I have a potential application for Seaside, but in our electronic world,
they want to print. Sending a programmatically generated pdf document back to the browser should suffice - I think. My first thought is to do that via LaTeX; generate the source and then (perhaps on Linux) pipe it into tex2pdf or whatever it's called, and then route that back to the browser through Seaside and OS Process. Am I dreaming? Is there a better way? BTW, printing the browser output will very likely NOT do the job. There will be much hand wringing over notations such as pg n of N, headers appearing on each page, etc. It is a medical application, and one has to be very careful about "lost" pages getting into the wrong patient's chart. You would probably not what your sister getting your dad's medications, right. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: [hidden email] Tel: (352) 846-1285 FAX: (352) 392-7029 _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Using LaTeX works fine. I generate documents all the time,
also including dot graphics. If you know your way around LaTeX (fonts fun) it is the fastest way to get going. Other options are: - XSL-FO; - The Haru PDF dll for really low-level work. Stephan _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Schwab,Wilhelm K
What about Simberon Reports? There's a VW version but I'm not
sure if a Squeak version exists or not.. I've never used it but am planning on playing with it later this year.. -- Rick On Aug 8, 2008, at 7:55 AM, Bill Schwab wrote: > I have a potential application for Seaside, but in our electronic > world, > they want to print. Sending a programmatically generated pdf document > back to the browser should suffice - I think. My first thought is > to do > that via LaTeX; generate the source and then (perhaps on Linux) pipe > it > into tex2pdf or whatever it's called, and then route that back to the > browser through Seaside and OS Process. > > Am I dreaming? Is there a better way? > > BTW, printing the browser output will very likely NOT do the job. > There > will be much hand wringing over notations such as pg n of N, headers > appearing on each page, etc. It is a medical application, and one has > to be very careful about "lost" pages getting into the wrong patient's > chart. You would probably not what your sister getting your dad's > medications, right. > > Bill > > > > > Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. > University of Florida > Department of Anesthesiology > PO Box 100254 > Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 > > Email: [hidden email] > Tel: (352) 846-1285 > FAX: (352) 392-7029 > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Schwab,Wilhelm K
PDFReactor, we feed it seaside generated xhtml and it works great. _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
In reply to this post by Rick Flower
For generating a document on the server and transferring it to the
client running a web browser, PDF format would be better than Simberon Reports. The latter draws the reports onto bitmaps and expects to be able to send them directly to the printer. David Buck Richard E. Flower wrote: > What about Simberon Reports? There's a VW version but I'm not > sure if a Squeak version exists or not.. I've never used it but am > planning > on playing with it later this year.. > > -- Rick > > On Aug 8, 2008, at 7:55 AM, Bill Schwab wrote: > >> I have a potential application for Seaside, but in our electronic world, >> they want to print. Sending a programmatically generated pdf document >> back to the browser should suffice - I think. My first thought is to do >> that via LaTeX; generate the source and then (perhaps on Linux) pipe it >> into tex2pdf or whatever it's called, and then route that back to the >> browser through Seaside and OS Process. >> >> Am I dreaming? Is there a better way? >> >> BTW, printing the browser output will very likely NOT do the job. There >> will be much hand wringing over notations such as pg n of N, headers >> appearing on each page, etc. It is a medical application, and one has >> to be very careful about "lost" pages getting into the wrong patient's >> chart. You would probably not what your sister getting your dad's >> medications, right. >> >> Bill >> >> >> >> >> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. >> University of Florida >> Department of Anesthesiology >> PO Box 100254 >> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 >> >> Email: [hidden email] >> Tel: (352) 846-1285 >> FAX: (352) 392-7029 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seaside mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >> > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > > _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Thanks David -- I didn't know that.. I was hoping it could spit out a
PDF report possibly.. (yes, I've not looked into it very deeply obviously!).. -- Rick On Aug 8, 2008, at 10:58 AM, David Buck wrote: > For generating a document on the server and transferring it to the > client running a web browser, PDF format would be better than > Simberon Reports. The latter draws the reports onto bitmaps and > expects to be able to send them directly to the printer. > > David Buck > > Richard E. Flower wrote: >> What about Simberon Reports? There's a VW version but I'm not >> sure if a Squeak version exists or not.. I've never used it but am >> planning >> on playing with it later this year.. >> >> -- Rick >> >> On Aug 8, 2008, at 7:55 AM, Bill Schwab wrote: >> >>> I have a potential application for Seaside, but in our electronic >>> world, >>> they want to print. Sending a programmatically generated pdf >>> document >>> back to the browser should suffice - I think. My first thought is >>> to do >>> that via LaTeX; generate the source and then (perhaps on Linux) >>> pipe it >>> into tex2pdf or whatever it's called, and then route that back to >>> the >>> browser through Seaside and OS Process. >>> >>> Am I dreaming? Is there a better way? >>> >>> BTW, printing the browser output will very likely NOT do the job. >>> There >>> will be much hand wringing over notations such as pg n of N, headers >>> appearing on each page, etc. It is a medical application, and one >>> has >>> to be very careful about "lost" pages getting into the wrong >>> patient's >>> chart. You would probably not what your sister getting your dad's >>> medications, right. >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. >>> University of Florida >>> Department of Anesthesiology >>> PO Box 100254 >>> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 >>> >>> Email: [hidden email] >>> Tel: (352) 846-1285 >>> FAX: (352) 392-7029 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> seaside mailing list >>> [hidden email] >>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seaside mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Don't forget to check out the archive. This is a question that comes
up once in a while and dozens of possibilities have been discussed and listed here in the mailing-list. It would be good if somebody could add a summary to the FAQ. Lukas On 8/9/08, Krishna <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Richard E. Flower <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Thanks David -- I didn't know that.. I was hoping it could spit out a PDF > > report possibly.. (yes, I've not looked > > into it very deeply obviously!).. > > > > -- Rick > > > > On Aug 8, 2008, at 10:58 AM, David Buck wrote: > > > >> For generating a document on the server and transferring it to the client > >> running a web browser, PDF format would be better than Simberon Reports. > >> The latter draws the reports onto bitmaps and expects to be able to send > >> them directly to the printer. > >> > >> David Buck > >> > >> Richard E. Flower wrote: > >>> > >>> What about Simberon Reports? There's a VW version but I'm not > >>> sure if a Squeak version exists or not.. I've never used it but am > >>> planning > >>> on playing with it later this year.. > >>> > >>> -- Rick > >>> > >>> On Aug 8, 2008, at 7:55 AM, Bill Schwab wrote: > >>> > >>>> I have a potential application for Seaside, but in our electronic world, > >>>> they want to print. Sending a programmatically generated pdf document > >>>> back to the browser should suffice - I think. My first thought is to do > >>>> that via LaTeX; generate the source and then (perhaps on Linux) pipe it > >>>> into tex2pdf or whatever it's called, and then route that back to the > >>>> browser through Seaside and OS Process. > >>>> > > > I've used groff (and tbl) for generating PDFs via Postscript. The > pipeline is fast and the resulting PDF can be served inline. If you > decided to take this route then also checkout the Heirloom document > tools project (http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/doctools.html) for > their's seem to be more "modern". > > Cheers, > -Krishna > > > -- > Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to > build bigger and better idiot- proof programs, and the Universe trying > to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. > - Richard Cook > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |