Marcus wrote
>This situation with the thousands of different VMs is *impossible*. We need >to fix that. If on Windows you should really use the installer for Pharo 1.2.2. from the download page. This will give you the two VM's: standard and Cog and you can use them to start all images from your HD. Since both have a different icon (also for the Pharo window) you always know which one you start/running on. Just give it a try, its simple. Since the Pharo.exe and PharoCog.exe also have the version number in the resource section you can right click on it in explorer and check which code version/revision they have (see attached screenshot). Bye T. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone vm.png (24K) Download Attachment |
On 19 May 2011 08:43, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Marcus wrote >>This situation with the thousands of different VMs is *impossible*. We need >to fix that. > > If on Windows you should really use the installer for Pharo 1.2.2. > from the download page. This will give you the two VM's: standard and Cog > and you can use them to start all images from your HD. > > Since both have a different icon (also for the Pharo window) > you always know which one you start/running on. > > Just give it a try, its simple. > > Since the Pharo.exe and PharoCog.exe also have the version number > in the resource section you can right click on it in explorer > and check which code version/revision they have (see attached screenshot). > Torsten, can you please document somewhere, how you chaging the version info? I really can't understand how today's VMs are versioned, and what version we could use for Pharo-branded VMs. Probably with 'P' suffix? > Bye > T. > > -- > NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! > Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. |
In reply to this post by Torsten Bergmann
On May 19, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > On 19 May 2011 08:43, Torsten Bergmann <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Marcus wrote >>> This situation with the thousands of different VMs is *impossible*. We need >to fix that. >> >> If on Windows you should really use the installer for Pharo 1.2.2. >> from the download page. This will give you the two VM's: standard and Cog >> and you can use them to start all images from your HD. >> >> Since both have a different icon (also for the Pharo window) >> you always know which one you start/running on. >> >> Just give it a try, its simple. >> >> Since the Pharo.exe and PharoCog.exe also have the version number >> in the resource section you can right click on it in explorer >> and check which code version/revision they have (see attached screenshot). >> > > Torsten, can you please document somewhere, how you chaging the version info? > I really can't understand how today's VMs are versioned, and what > version we could use for Pharo-branded VMs. > Probably with 'P' suffix? *PLEASE* do not take the version numbering that is now in the Squeak VM. Nobody understands why there is a Version 5 MacVM. Version 5? Squeak is at Verison 4, Pharo at 1. We *neeeeeeed* for every version of Pharo a VM that has *just* the same version number. Pharo 1.3 uses VM 1.3. 1.4 uses VM 1.4 Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. |
In reply to this post by Igor Stasenko
On 19.05.2011 09:16, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 19 May 2011 08:43, Torsten Bergmann<[hidden email]> wrote: >> Marcus wrote >>> This situation with the thousands of different VMs is *impossible*. We need>to fix that. >> If on Windows you should really use the installer for Pharo 1.2.2. >> from the download page. This will give you the two VM's: standard and Cog >> and you can use them to start all images from your HD. >> >> Since both have a different icon (also for the Pharo window) >> you always know which one you start/running on. >> >> Just give it a try, its simple. >> >> Since the Pharo.exe and PharoCog.exe also have the version number >> in the resource section you can right click on it in explorer >> and check which code version/revision they have (see attached screenshot). >> > Torsten, can you please document somewhere, how you chaging the version info? rc myApp.rc ResHacker.exe -addoverwrite myApp.exe, myApp.exe, myApp.res, versioninfo,1, where myApp.rc is the attached, actual values defined in config.h. So it's not much magic needed :) rc can be found as part of Visual Studio, and reshacker is freeware, there's a beta with 64bit exe support. Cheers, Henry myApp.rc (874 bytes) Download Attachment |
On 19 May 2011 09:39, Henrik Sperre Johansen
<[hidden email]> wrote: > On 19.05.2011 09:16, Igor Stasenko wrote: >> >> On 19 May 2011 08:43, Torsten Bergmann<[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Marcus wrote >>>> >>>> This situation with the thousands of different VMs is *impossible*. We >>>> need>to fix that. >>> >>> If on Windows you should really use the installer for Pharo 1.2.2. >>> from the download page. This will give you the two VM's: standard and Cog >>> and you can use them to start all images from your HD. >>> >>> Since both have a different icon (also for the Pharo window) >>> you always know which one you start/running on. >>> >>> Just give it a try, its simple. >>> >>> Since the Pharo.exe and PharoCog.exe also have the version number >>> in the resource section you can right click on it in explorer >>> and check which code version/revision they have (see attached >>> screenshot). >>> >> Torsten, can you please document somewhere, how you chaging the version >> info? > > Here's how we do it for our application: > > rc myApp.rc > ResHacker.exe -addoverwrite myApp.exe, myApp.exe, myApp.res, > versioninfo,1, > > where myApp.rc is the attached, actual values defined in config.h. > So it's not much magic needed :) > since we can reliably build them from scratch. > rc can be found as part of Visual Studio, and reshacker is freeware, there's > a beta with 64bit exe support. > > Cheers, > Henry > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. |
In reply to this post by Marcus Denker-4
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
+1.
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |