Hi
today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- debugger ad I noticed that I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I got a resume I do not what and I could not see the other halt. Is it only me? Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Stef,
So far, it might be just you??? I tried the following in 10236 and can proceed from the first halt (either on the notifier or in the full debugger) and see the second. Have I matched your scenario? I've even tried going elsewhere in the callstack and been ok. In fact, I would prefer the debugger to pick an earlier frame in most (all?) situations; e.g. it selects the #halt method rather than the sender, which is what Dolphin has lead me to expect. Bill DoubleHale>>tryMe 2 + 3. self halt. 4+5. self halt. " DoubleHalt new tryMe. " -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 1:29 PM To: Pharo Development Subject: [Pharo-project] Problem with the OB debugger Hi today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- debugger ad I noticed that I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I got a resume I do not what and I could not see the other halt. Is it only me? Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
did you tried in different methods?
Stef On Feb 20, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Stef, > > So far, it might be just you??? I tried the following in 10236 and > can proceed from the first halt (either on the notifier or in the > full debugger) and see the second. > > Have I matched your scenario? I've even tried going elsewhere in > the callstack and been ok. In fact, I would prefer the debugger to > pick an earlier frame in most (all?) situations; e.g. it selects the > #halt method rather than the sender, which is what Dolphin has lead > me to expect. > > Bill > > > > DoubleHale>>tryMe > > 2 + 3. > self halt. > 4+5. > self halt. > > " > DoubleHalt new tryMe. > " > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email] > ] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 1:29 PM > To: Pharo Development > Subject: [Pharo-project] Problem with the OB debugger > > Hi > > today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- > debugger ad I noticed that > I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I got a > resume I do not what > and I could not see the other halt. > Is it only me? > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Stef,
I had not, but (I think) just did and it worked as expected. See attached and let me know. Bill -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 1:55 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Problem with the OB debugger did you tried in different methods? Stef On Feb 20, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Stef, > > So far, it might be just you??? I tried the following in 10236 and > can proceed from the first halt (either on the notifier or in the full > debugger) and see the second. > > Have I matched your scenario? I've even tried going elsewhere in the > callstack and been ok. In fact, I would prefer the debugger to pick > an earlier frame in most (all?) situations; e.g. it selects the #halt > method rather than the sender, which is what Dolphin has lead me to > expect. > > Bill > > > > DoubleHale>>tryMe > > 2 + 3. > self halt. > 4+5. > self halt. > > " > DoubleHalt new tryMe. > " > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email] > ] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 1:29 PM > To: Pharo Development > Subject: [Pharo-project] Problem with the OB debugger > > Hi > > today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- > debugger ad I noticed that I could not have two halts else after > proceeding the first one I got a resume I do not what and I could not > see the other halt. > Is it only me? > > Stef > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project DoubleHalt.st (904 bytes) Download Attachment |
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
Stéphane,
What did the method look like? I just tried putting halts into a method and was able to proceed and step across the second halt. Dale ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: | Hi | | today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- | debugger ad I noticed that | I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I got a | | resume I do not what | and I could not see the other halt. | Is it only me? | | Stef | | _______________________________________________ | Pharo-project mailing list | [hidden email] | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Stéphane Ducasse
Hmmm,
Do you have a version on OB-Tools? I tested with OB-Tools-EL.60. Dale ----- "Dale Henrichs" <[hidden email]> wrote: | Stéphane, | | What did the method look like? I just tried putting halts into a | method and was able to proceed and step across the second halt. | | Dale | | ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: | | | Hi | | | | today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- | | debugger ad I noticed that | | I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I got | a | | | | resume I do not what | | and I could not see the other halt. | | Is it only me? | | | | Stef | | | | _______________________________________________ | | Pharo-project mailing list | | [hidden email] | | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | | _______________________________________________ | Pharo-project mailing list | [hidden email] | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Dale
I do not have it. It was on two students code. So I'm sure that this is
something that we can repeat because two of them got this behavior. When I run the tests and put halt in different methods I never succeeded to get to the second one. I had to remove the first halt. Else I got a resume I do not remember what. I could try to redo it. On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:22 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Stéphane, > > What did the method look like? I just tried putting halts into a > method and was able to proceed and step across the second halt. > > Dale > > ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > | Hi > | > | today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- > | debugger ad I noticed that > | I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I > got a > | > | resume I do not what > | and I could not see the other halt. > | Is it only me? > | > | Stef > | > | _______________________________________________ > | Pharo-project mailing list > | [hidden email] > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Dale
I do not really know but they took the latest version of pharo-dev
that was available the 13th (the first day oft the lecture). stef On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:24 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Hmmm, > > Do you have a version on OB-Tools? I tested with OB-Tools-EL.60. > > Dale > > ----- "Dale Henrichs" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > | Stéphane, > | > | What did the method look like? I just tried putting halts into a > | method and was able to proceed and step across the second halt. > | > | Dale > | > | ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: > | > | | Hi > | | > | | today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- > | | debugger ad I noticed that > | | I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I > got > | a > | | > | | resume I do not what > | | and I could not see the other halt. > | | Is it only me? > | | > | | Stef > | | > | | _______________________________________________ > | | Pharo-project mailing list > | | [hidden email] > | | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- > project > | > | _______________________________________________ > | Pharo-project mailing list > | [hidden email] > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
In reply to this post by Dale
I do not have it. It was on two students code. So I'm sure that this is
something that we can repeat because two of them got this behavior. When I run the tests and put halt in different methods I never succeeded to get to the second one. I had to remove the first halt. Else I got a resume I do not remember what. I could try to redo it. On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:22 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Stéphane, > > What did the method look like? I just tried putting halts into a > method and was able to proceed and step across the second halt. > > Dale > > ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > | Hi > | > | today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- > | debugger ad I noticed that > | I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I > got a > | > | resume I do not what > | and I could not see the other halt. > | Is it only me? > | > | Stef > | > | _______________________________________________ > | Pharo-project mailing list > | [hidden email] > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Stéphane,
I have one or two pending things in the debugger, so I'll mess around to see if I can recreate it myself, as well. Dale ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: | I do not have it. It was on two students code. So I'm sure that this | is | something that we can repeat because two of them got this behavior. | When I run the tests and put halt in different methods | I never succeeded to get to the second one. I had to remove the first | | halt. | Else I got a resume I do not remember what. | | I could try to redo it. | | On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:22 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: | | > Stéphane, | > | > What did the method look like? I just tried putting halts into a | > method and was able to proceed and step across the second halt. | > | > Dale | > | > ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: | > | > | Hi | > | | > | today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- | > | debugger ad I noticed that | > | I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I | | > got a | > | | > | resume I do not what | > | and I could not see the other halt. | > | Is it only me? | > | | > | Stef | > | | > | _______________________________________________ | > | Pharo-project mailing list | > | [hidden email] | > | | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | > | > _______________________________________________ | > Pharo-project mailing list | > [hidden email] | > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project | > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
I will give a try tomorrow morning now it is sleeping time :)
On Feb 20, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > Stéphane, > > I have one or two pending things in the debugger, so I'll mess > around to see if I can recreate it myself, as well. > > Dale > ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > | I do not have it. It was on two students code. So I'm sure that this > | is > | something that we can repeat because two of them got this behavior. > | When I run the tests and put halt in different methods > | I never succeeded to get to the second one. I had to remove the > first > | > | halt. > | Else I got a resume I do not remember what. > | > | I could try to redo it. > | > | On Feb 20, 2009, at 8:22 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote: > | > | > Stéphane, > | > > | > What did the method look like? I just tried putting halts into a > | > method and was able to proceed and step across the second halt. > | > > | > Dale > | > > | > ----- "Stéphane Ducasse" <[hidden email]> wrote: > | > > | > | Hi > | > | > | > | today I was giving lectures with the pahro-dev image and its OB- > | > | debugger ad I noticed that > | > | I could not have two halts else after proceeding the first one I > | > | > got a > | > | > | > | resume I do not what > | > | and I could not see the other halt. > | > | Is it only me? > | > | > | > | Stef > | > | > | > | _______________________________________________ > | > | Pharo-project mailing list > | > | [hidden email] > | > | > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > | > > | > _______________________________________________ > | > Pharo-project mailing list > | > [hidden email] > | > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo- > project > | > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |