Processing js initialisation?
Locked
 
|
Hello
I go stuck initialising processing in Amber 0.13. Method ProcessingClock>>firstProcessingInstance firstProcessingInstance <return Processing.instances[0]> I posted the question here including the link to the proper repo: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27374889/how-do-i-access-a-javascript-global-processing-initialisation. Regards Hannes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: Processing js initialisation?
|
|
Hello
I just returned from my vacation. I will try to follow all the previous communication regarding amber and processingJS. Where can I find the most current sources of your merge? The initialization of amber starts already in the index.html if I remember right.... Sebastian Am 09.12.2014 01:40, schrieb H. Hirzel: > Hello > > I go stuck initialising processing in Amber 0.13. > > > Method ProcessingClock>>firstProcessingInstance > > firstProcessingInstance > > <return Processing.instances[0]> > > I posted the question here including the link to the proper repo: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27374889/how-do-i-access-a-javascript-global-processing-initialisation. > > Regards > > Hannes > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: Processing js initialisation?
|
|
Hello Sebastian
Hope you had a good vacation ... Here is the latest code https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/issues/58 It loads the amber init sample application and the Processing-Examples.st code fine. But there is an issue with the initialisation of processing.js. We have to get the right processing.amd.json file. What does not work is { "paths": { "processing": "bower_components/processing" } } Herby's latest answer on this is <citation> Paths section is libdir-relative. And if you are only loading one .js file from that path, you don't map the path, but the file itself (it's in fact preferred), without final .js. </citation> I assume what he means with 'libdir' is 'bower-components'. So I do not have to mention 'bower-components' and then in /home/hhzl/amber-examples/processing/bower_components/processing I have bower.json processing.js processing.min.js So the next thing I try is to have the following in file 'processing.amd.json file' { "paths": { "processing": "processing/processing" } } This is where we are currenly. Happy that you chime in. The issue as for now is to get the original https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/tree/master/processing working. In the gh-58 branch. And if that works I can merge everything into main (amber-examples). Then we can add the additional examples you have in your https://github.com/HeSe/amber-processingJs in a proper version 0.13 --Hannes On 12/9/14, 'Sebastian Heidbrink' via amber-lang <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello > > I just returned from my vacation. > > I will try to follow all the previous communication regarding amber and > processingJS. > > Where can I find the most current sources of your merge? > > The initialization of amber starts already in the index.html if I > remember right.... > > Sebastian > > > Am 09.12.2014 01:40, schrieb H. Hirzel: >> Hello >> >> I go stuck initialising processing in Amber 0.13. >> >> >> Method ProcessingClock>>firstProcessingInstance >> >> firstProcessingInstance >> >> <return Processing.instances[0]> >> >> I posted the question here including the link to the proper repo: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27374889/how-do-i-access-a-javascript-global-processing-initialisation. >> >> Regards >> >> Hannes >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "amber-lang" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [hidden email]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: Processing js initialisation?
|
|
In reply to this post by Amber Smalltalk mailing list
Hello Sebastian
Hope you had a good vacation ... Here is the latest code https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/issues/58 It loads the amber init sample application and the Processing-Examples.st code fine. But there is an issue with the initialisation of processing.js. We have to get the right processing.amd.json file. What does not work is { "paths": { "processing": "bower_components/processing" } } Herby's latest answer on this is <citation> Paths section is libdir-relative. And if you are only loading one .js file from that path, you don't map the path, but the file itself (it's in fact preferred), without final .js. </citation> I assume what he means with 'libdir' is 'bower-components'. So I do not have to mention 'bower-components' and then in /home/hhzl/amber-examples/processing/bower_components/processing I have bower.json processing.js processing.min.js So the next thing I try is to have the following in file 'processing.amd.json file' { "paths": { "processing": "processing/processing" } } This is where we are currenly. Happy that you chime in. The issue as for now is to get the original https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/tree/master/processing working. In the gh-58 branch. And if that works I can merge everything into main (amber-examples). Then we can add the additional examples you have in your https://github.com/HeSe/amber-processingJs in a proper version 0.13 --Hannes On 12/9/14, 'Sebastian Heidbrink' via amber-lang <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello > > I just returned from my vacation. > > I will try to follow all the previous communication regarding amber and > processingJS. > > Where can I find the most current sources of your merge? > > The initialization of amber starts already in the index.html if I > remember right.... > > Sebastian > > > Am 09.12.2014 01:40, schrieb H. Hirzel: >> Hello >> >> I go stuck initialising processing in Amber 0.13. >> >> >> Method ProcessingClock>>firstProcessingInstance >> >> firstProcessingInstance >> >> <return Processing.instances[0]> >> >> I posted the question here including the link to the proper repo: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27374889/how-do-i-access-a-javascript-global-processing-initialisation. >> >> Regards >> >> Hannes >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "amber-lang" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [hidden email]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: Processing js initialisation?
|
|
In reply to this post by Hannes Hirzel
H. Hirzel wrote: > Herby's latest answer on this is > > <citation> > Paths section is libdir-relative. > > And if you are only loading one .js file from that path, you don't map > the path, but the file itself (it's in fact preferred), without final > .js. > </citation> > > I assume what he means with 'libdir' is 'bower-components'. So I do > not have to mention 'bower-components' and then in Of course not, directory of processing lib is directory of processing lib. You may have any layout you want, no one prescribes single bower_components. Herby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: Processing js initialisation?
|
|
In reply to this post by Amber Smalltalk mailing list
Hello Sebastian
Hope you had a good vacation ... Here is the latest code https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/issues/58 It loads the amber init sample application and the Processing-Examples.st code fine. But there is an issue with the initialisation of processing.js. We have to get the right processing.amd.json file. What does not work is { "paths": { "processing": "bower_components/processing" } } Herby's latest answer on this is <citation> Paths section is libdir-relative. And if you are only loading one .js file from that path, you don't map the path, but the file itself (it's in fact preferred), without final .js. </citation> I assume what he means with 'libdir' is 'bower-components'. So I do not have to mention 'bower-components' and then in /home/hhzl/amber-examples/processing/bower_components/processing I have bower.json processing.js processing.min.js So the next thing I try is to have the following in file 'processing.amd.json file' { "paths": { "processing": "processing/processing" } } This is where we are currenly. Happy that you chime in. The issue as for now is to get the original https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/tree/master/processing working. In the gh58 branch. https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/tree/gh58/processing And if that works we can merge everything into main (amber-examples). Then we can add the additional examples you have in your https://github.com/HeSe/amber-processingJs repo included in a proper version 0.13 in amber-examples (this will be a separate issue) --Hannes On 12/9/14, 'Sebastian Heidbrink' via amber-lang <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello > > I just returned from my vacation. > > I will try to follow all the previous communication regarding amber and > processingJS. > > Where can I find the most current sources of your merge? > > The initialization of amber starts already in the index.html if I > remember right.... > > Sebastian > > > Am 09.12.2014 01:40, schrieb H. Hirzel: >> Hello >> >> I go stuck initialising processing in Amber 0.13. >> >> >> Method ProcessingClock>>firstProcessingInstance >> >> firstProcessingInstance >> >> <return Processing.instances[0]> >> >> I posted the question here including the link to the proper repo: >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27374889/how-do-i-access-a-javascript-global-processing-initialisation. >> >> Regards >> >> Hannes >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "amber-lang" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [hidden email]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: Processing js initialisation?
|
|
In reply to this post by Hannes Hirzel
Hello again,
from a first look at the sources I expect some work on the amber processing code it self. The way the current ProcessingInstance it retrieved askes for a initial initialization in the index.html file. This was changed in my lib wrapper repository. Here you can have several instances of Processing in one page. I'll have a look. Sebastian Am 09.12.2014 07:03, schrieb H. Hirzel: > Hello Sebastian > > Hope you had a good vacation ... > > Here is the latest code > > https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/issues/58 > > It loads the amber init sample application and the > Processing-Examples.st code fine. > > But there is an issue with the initialisation of processing.js. > > We have to get the right processing.amd.json file. > > What does not work is > > { > "paths": { > "processing": "bower_components/processing" > } > } > > > Herby's latest answer on this is > > <citation> > Paths section is libdir-relative. > > And if you are only loading one .js file from that path, you don't map > the path, but the file itself (it's in fact preferred), without final > .js. > </citation> > > I assume what he means with 'libdir' is 'bower-components'. So I do > not have to mention 'bower-components' and then in > > /home/hhzl/amber-examples/processing/bower_components/processing > > I have > > bower.json > processing.js > processing.min.js > > So the next thing I try is to have the following in file > 'processing.amd.json file' > > > { > "paths": { > "processing": "processing/processing" > } > } > > This is where we are currenly. Happy that you chime in. The issue as > for now is to get the original > https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/tree/master/processing > working. > > In the gh-58 branch. And if that works I can merge everything into > main (amber-examples). > > Then we can add the additional examples you have in your > https://github.com/HeSe/amber-processingJs > in a proper version 0.13 > > --Hannes > > > > > > > > On 12/9/14, 'Sebastian Heidbrink' via amber-lang > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Hello >> >> I just returned from my vacation. >> >> I will try to follow all the previous communication regarding amber and >> processingJS. >> >> Where can I find the most current sources of your merge? >> >> The initialization of amber starts already in the index.html if I >> remember right.... >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> Am 09.12.2014 01:40, schrieb H. Hirzel: >>> Hello >>> >>> I go stuck initialising processing in Amber 0.13. >>> >>> >>> Method ProcessingClock>>firstProcessingInstance >>> >>> firstProcessingInstance >>> >>> <return Processing.instances[0]> >>> >>> I posted the question here including the link to the proper repo: >>> >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27374889/how-do-i-access-a-javascript-global-processing-initialisation. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Hannes >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "amber-lang" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [hidden email]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
Re: Processing js initialisation?
|
|
This reminds me, if processing.js is amd-aware, do not use the global, but use `require value: 'processing'` in code to get to the module (even if it isn't, you can use this form but you need to add "shim": { "processing": { "exports": "Processing"}} sections to processing.amd.json.
'Sebastian Heidbrink' via amber-lang wrote: > Hello again, > > from a first look at the sources I expect some work on the amber > processing code it self. > The way the current ProcessingInstance it retrieved askes for a > initial initialization in the index.html file. > > This was changed in my lib wrapper repository. Here you can have > several instances of Processing in one page. > > I'll have a look. > > Sebastian > > > Am 09.12.2014 07:03, schrieb H. Hirzel: >> Hello Sebastian >> >> Hope you had a good vacation ... >> >> Here is the latest code >> >> https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/issues/58 >> >> It loads the amber init sample application and the >> Processing-Examples. >> >> But there is an issue with the initialisation of processing.js. >> >> We have to get the right processing.amd.json file. >> >> What does not work is >> >> { >> "paths": { >> "processing": "bower_components/processing" >> } >> } >> >> >> Herby's latest answer on this is >> >> <citation> >> Paths section is libdir-relative. >> >> And if you are only loading one .js file from that path, you don't map >> the path, but the file itself (it's in fact preferred), without final >> .js. >> </citation> >> >> I assume what he means with 'libdir' is 'bower-components'. So I do >> not have to mention 'bower-components' and then in >> >> /home/hhzl/amber-examples/processing/bower_components/processing >> >> I have >> >> bower.json >> processing.js >> processing.min.js >> >> So the next thing I try is to have the following in file >> 'processing.amd.json file' >> >> >> { >> "paths": { >> "processing": "processing/processing" >> } >> } >> >> This is where we are currenly. >> for now is to get the original >> https://github.com/amber-smalltalk/amber-examples/tree/master/processing >> working. >> >> In the gh-58 branch. And if that works I can merge everything into >> main (amber-examples). >> >> Then we can add the additional examples you have in your >> https://github.com/HeSe/amber-processingJs >> in a proper version 0.13 >> >> --Hannes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 12/9/14, 'Sebastian Heidbrink' via amber-lang >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> I just returned from my vacation. >>> >>> I will try to follow all the previous communication regarding amber and >>> processingJS. >>> >>> Where can I find the most current sources of your merge? >>> >>> The initialization of amber starts already in the index.html if I >>> remember right.... >>> >>> Sebastian >>> >>> >>> Am 09.12.2014 01:40, schrieb H. Hirzel: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> I go stuck initialising processing in Amber 0.13. >>>> >>>> >>> > Method ProcessingClock>>firstProcessingInstance >>>> >>>> firstProcessingInstance >>>> >>>> <return Processing.instances[0]> >>>> >>>> I posted the question here including the link to the proper repo: >>>> >>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27374889/how-do-i-access-a-javascript-global-processing-initialisation. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Hannes >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> "amber-lang" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>> send an >>> email to [hidden email]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "amber-lang" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [hidden email]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
«
Return to Amber Smalltalk
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |