[Q] Are there any performance difference between KomHttp and Swazoo(1.0 or 2.0)?

Hi,

As the subject says, which one is more performant, in squeak?
I think that there's not much difference, but I'm curious. :-)

PS)
Seaside can run with Swazoo in Squeak?
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

2007/8/14, "S.J.Chun" <[hidden email]>:
> Hi,
>
> As the subject says, which one is more performant, in squeak?
> I think that there's not much difference, but I'm curious. :-)
>
> PS)
> Seaside can run with Swazoo in Squeak?

At the moment AFAIK no.

Philippe

> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
>
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside

S.J.Chun wrote:

> As the subject says, which one is more performant, in squeak?
> I think that there's not much difference, but I'm curious. :-)

I'm not aware any of such comparisons but just for a taste you can look
at the short benchmark while doing my recent optimizations of Swazoo
HTTP serving part, specially when dealing with large files:

        http://www.swazoo.org/streaming.html#h-4

Above is for file uploads. And for file downloads from my recent post
(Re: [Seaside] Swazoo web server 22.7.07):

"Now a 20MB file is served with about 4MB/sec on 100Mb line while
[parallel] 11KB requests are just slightly slower, about 160ms instead
of 120 on 4Mb line."


Best regards
Janko



--
Janko Mivšek
AIDA/Web
Smalltalk Web Application Server
http://www.aidaweb.si
_______________________________________________
Seaside mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside