Questions on Traits

>
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Marcus Denker <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Noury Bouraqadi <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > -Why new methods are compiled from the ones of traits? I remember that in the first implementation, when a trait was used by a class, new entries were introduced to the methodDict where the values  are the compiled methods from the trait. Currently, a new compiled method is introduced with the exact code of the on from the trait. Why?
> >
> Because you need to be able to somehow find the class and trait of a CompiledMethod. And that is encoded in it's literal array.
>
>
> Marcus, I cannot see where this is installed. Do you have an example?
> Let's use TEmptyTest with #testIfEmpty and SortedCollectionTest
>  
>

>
> Noury
> --
> http://twitter.com/#!/NouryBouraqadi
> http://www.kroobe.com/profile/noury
>
>
> Afin de contribuer au respect de l'environnement,
> merci de n'imprimer ce courriel qu'en cas de necessite
>
> Please consider the environment before you print
>
>
>
>

>
> On Aug 13, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Noury Bouraqadi wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> -Why new methods are compiled from the ones of traits? I remember that in the first implementation, when a trait was used by a class, new entries were introduced to the methodDict where the values  are the compiled methods from the trait. Currently, a new compiled method is introduced with the exact code of the on from the trait. Why?
>>
>> -It is possible to compile a method that includes a super send in traits. Does it make sense?
>
> I think yes. But indeed the application of the trait should rebind the "super" encoding
>