You are making a very good point. the force based layout is a crucial layout and deserve to be properly documented.
Starting from I will have plenty of times for Roassal. I will make sure this layout is properly documented
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel
http://www.bergel.eu^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Dec 5, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> Hi guys. I am trying to understand how the force based layout works. So there are charge: strength: and length: accessors. I understand how charge works a bit, but changing length and strength didn’t give me any visible results.
>
> Cheers.
> Uko
>
> P.S. maybe it’s reasonable to comment classes a bit? Because almost all layouts does not have classes so when I want to layout my graph I end up in the middle of nowhere.
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Locked
