In latest moose image do:
RTNameCloud new example1 Apparently, there are some extension methods of Roassal 1 that need to be ported to Roassal 2. It would be good to make sure that Roassal 1 can be loaded without any conflicts when porting these to Roassal 2 because Roassal 1 is still being used. I can open a bug report. usman _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Hi Usman,
Indeed, I have noticied this problem this morning. I have fixed this since. Update and it will work. Cheers, Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Alex, It is still not working. In the latest moose image, RTNameCloud new example1 gives: Array(Object)>>doesNotUnderstand: #sortedAs So there might be a few methods not ported yet. usman On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Alexandre Bergel <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Arg... Was a messy situation with class extension. Should be fixed now. Alexandre
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |