Thanks, I hadn't yet realized about the appending.
The whole series was actually with the same drivers. And while it sounds
crazy, I *think* that I somehow once got the thing to run a couple of
Maybe this card has some capability (say, stencil buffering) that
matches the demands of some scenes but not others?
David Faught wrote:
> The Squeak3D.log file gets appended onto, so you had several sets of
> startup stuff included. The few lines at the end of each set seems
> to be the important part. This is a lame Microsoft emulated driver
> that doesn't really do much:
> OpenGL vendor: Microsoft Corporation <<< GLView reports "Intel"
> OpenGL renderer: GDI Generic <<< GLView reports "Intel 945GM" OpenGL
> version: 1.1.0 OpenGL extensions: GL_WIN_swap_hint GL_EXT_bgra
> and this is a much better one:
> OpenGL vendor: Intel OpenGL renderer: Intel 945GM OpenGL version:
> 1.4.0 - Build 126.96.36.19946 OpenGL extensions: GL_ARB_depth_texture
> GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_multitexture GL_ARB_point_parameters
> GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_texture_compression
> GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add
> GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3
> GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_ARB_transpose_matrix
> GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_window_pos
> GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_func_separate
> GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint
> GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_EXT_cull_vertex
> GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays
> GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_secondary_color
> GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_shadow_funcs
> GL_EXT_stencil_two_side GL_EXT_stencil_wrap
> GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_env_add
> GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic
> GL_EXT_texture3D GL_3DFX_texture_compression_FXT1
> GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_NV_blend_square
> GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_WIN_swap_hint
> Both of these were from your post, I'm assuming from when you had
> different drivers installed. You can see that the second one DOES
> list out the extension you were wondering about.
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Division of Information Technology
mailto:[hidden email] jabber:[hidden email] voice:+1-608-262-3724
Howard Stearns wrote:
> The whole series was actually with the same drivers. And while it sounds
> crazy, I *think* that I somehow once got the thing to run a couple of
> demos once.
> Maybe this card has some capability (say, stencil buffering) that
> matches the demands of some scenes but not others?
No, we always request the same capabilities. In an entirely unrelated
set of experiments however I have found that memory requirements can
play a relevant role, e.g., if you load sizable other libraries before
starting Croquet it will fall back to the software renderer. I can only
guess that what happens is that opengl32.dll fails to load the ICD which
ultimately provides the accelerated driver.
I'll send you (off-list) a VM that fixed the problem for me (by reducing
the default max. virtual memory size from 1GB to 512MB). Let me know if
it works for you - if it does, I'll change the default generally.