|
>> May this is a ridiculuous thought but may be it would be good to start an effort on
>> build a library for Smalltalk. Reusing some part of mondrian could be good.
>>
>> It would be very slow and really a lot of work. Mondrian is nice for visualization, but a Graph library is a lot more than that.
> But not starting means that we will never have anything.
> If there are multiple people needed something this means that they can join forces.
> For Moose, mondrian, glamour, petitParser, RB.... nothing came out from a day to the other one
> this is just that some guys starred and continued to push.
> Stef
If there was a basic library for graphs then people who need specific
graph algorithm
implementations could contribute that implementation once they
complete it for their
application. By this means a more complete graph library would
gradually evolve.
All we need for now is a well designed framework for implementing
graph algorithms
in with implementations of some common algorithms.
Regards,
Ralph Boland
--
Quantum Theory cannot save us from the tyranny of a deterministic universe
but it does give God something to do
|