> I just wanted to add that I agree the change is currently at the wrong
> level. Whilst the change was done with the best intentions, and in
> the best spirit of what Pharo is trying to be, the impact on the user
> was not obvious until it was live. I wanted to load the cryptography
> package so that I could play with the Amazon cloud stuff. I get
> exactly the same warning and it is a disruption. I agree with the
> thread that said this should be a code critic rule, and / or there is
> some control over when the warnings are raised. I also saw that Doru
> was having issues with it as well in another thread. I'm all for
> change, but in this case we need to be more sophisticated about it.
>
> thanks,
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Ok
>>
>>>>
>>> Lets discuss this monday.
>>
>> :)
>>
>>> I am not against change, but this chagne is *at the wrong level*.
>>>
>>> I don't want RB Lint to do the check in the browser (maybe later),
>>> it can be done just the same it is now done in the classbuilder, just
>>> in the browser. That's where we want it, as it talks to the user.
>>
>> Why not then.
>> My gut feeling is that we should have LARGE warning when also saving
>> or loading code.
>> Consistency can be a good thing
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>
[hidden email]
>>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
[hidden email]
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project>
Locked
