Re: Issue 2045 in pharo: Better package creation

Updates:
        Labels: Type-Feature

Comment #6 on issue 2045 by [hidden email]: Better package creation
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2045

(No comment was entered for this change.)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Workneeded

Comment #7 on issue 2045 by [hidden email]: Better package creation
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2045

(No comment was entered for this change.)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: WorkNeeded

Comment #8 on issue 2045 by [hidden email]: Better package creation
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2045

(No comment was entered for this change.)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: WontFix

Comment #9 on issue 2045 by [hidden email]: Better package creation
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2045

This should be closed. It does not make sense anymore, since we should  
rewrite the monticello browser using Spec


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker