Re: Issue 2621 in pharo: haltOnce haltOnCount

Comment #5 on issue 2621 by [hidden email]: haltOnce haltOnCount
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2621

For haltOnce, I don't think a comment is required. Any attempt merely what  
the code already says. The source of the confusion is that the accessors  
for the HaltOnce global are on the instance side of object. There'd be no  
problem if the method read:

        Smalltalk haltOnceEnabled
                ifTrue: [Smalltalk clearHaltOnce.
                        ^ self halt].

See issue http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4714


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Comment #6 on issue 2621 by [hidden email]: haltOnce haltOnCount
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2621

Should be merged into Issue 2394: Halt


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker

Updates:
        Status: Duplicate
        Mergedinto: 2394

Comment #7 on issue 2621 by [hidden email]: haltOnce haltOnCount
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2621

(No comment was entered for this change.)


_______________________________________________
Pharo-bugtracker mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-bugtracker