Re: Issue 390 in moose-technology: MoqamBrowser does not need to put module marks in a dictionary

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 390 in moose-technology: MoqamBrowser does not need to put module marks in a dictionary

moose-technology
Updates:
        Status: WontFix

Comment #1 on issue 390 by [hidden email]: MoqamBrowser does not  
need to put module marks in a dictionary
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=390

Nobody working on Moqam for now

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Issue 390 in moose-technology: MoqamBrowser does not need to put module marks in a dictionary

moose-technology

Comment #2 on issue 390 by [hidden email]: MoqamBrowser does not  
need to put module marks in a dictionary
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=390

maybe andre will take some metrics

_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev