I totally agree with you. But the mentioned project was a viable option two years ago, when it was trying to get developer traction and the "runs on JVM" was a hyped feature (not to mention the bad experience almost everyone had with such things). Amber is, IMO, way more valuable and with a greater feature than Redline. And I never used any of them. I wouldn't do a PR campaign mentioning VW's Pollock UI, Pharo's Spec or any other abandoned project whatsoever. A different thing is a project of which you can expect to move at a slow pace, but uninterruptedly. Regards, |
---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <---
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile |
Le 15/1/15 13:39, Johan Fabry a écrit :
I don’t know the entire context of the discussion (i’m not following Pharo-dev, where this came from apparently.) But I would like to point out that it is wrong to think of Spec as an abandoned project! Spec is here to stay, and hopefully for a very long time. +1. Especially since we are in the period of the year where I'm much more important at planning budget and resources than anything else :) |
In reply to this post by Esteban A. Maringolo
I agree that Amber is important, given that client-side web development is the fad du jour. But having a Smalltalk on the JVM is also important if we want to penetrate the enterprise. JVM is the closest thing we have to a "standard" enterprise platform.
Languages such as Scala and Groovy have had some measure of success on the JVM. I'd be happy if Smalltalk could achieve even this level of popularity! Generalissimo
|
If Redline is ready and good to build native (Java) Android apps
with it, I'll be one of the first ones to try it. So I look forward to Redline 1.0 :) Esteban A. Maringolo 2015-01-17 13:46 GMT-03:00 horrido <[hidden email]>: > I agree that Amber is important, given that client-side web development is > the /fad du jour/. But having a Smalltalk on the JVM is also important if we > want to penetrate the enterprise. JVM is the closest thing we have to a > "standard" enterprise platform. > > Languages such as Scala and Groovy have had some measure of success on the > JVM. I'd be happy if Smalltalk could achieve even this level of popularity! > > Generalissimo > > > Esteban A. Maringolo wrote >> El ene 15, 2015 8:55 AM, "Sebastian Sastre" < > >> sebastian@ > >> > >> escribió: >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 14, 2015, at 9:44 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo < > >> emaringolo@ > >> > >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Shaking the hive can certainly have a positive outcome, but you can also >> get you bitten. :) >>> >>> >>> And what’s the news on that? >>> >>> The world is full of people paralysed by fear. >>> >>> Scared people is not worth following (they are not going to invent any >> interesting future). >>> >>> The ones who dear to do different are way more interesting. >>> >> >> I totally agree with you. But the mentioned project was a viable option >> two >> years ago, when it was trying to get developer traction and the "runs on >> JVM" was a hyped feature (not to mention the bad experience almost >> everyone >> had with such things). >> >> Amber is, IMO, way more valuable and with a greater feature than Redline. >> And I never used any of them. >> >> I wouldn't do a PR campaign mentioning VW's Pollock UI, Pharo's Spec or >> any >> other abandoned project whatsoever. >> >> A different thing is a project of which you can expect to move at a slow >> pace, but uninterruptedly. >> >> Regards, > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-Pharo-dev-InfoWorld-on-Redline-Smalltalk-tp4799686p4800174.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |