> BTW, last week I wrote a metacello configuration group to load GlorpDBX with the native postgres driver. You can evaluate first: > > > Gofer new > squeaksource: 'MetacelloRepository'; > package: 'ConfigurationOfGlorpDBX'; > load. > > and then > > (ConfigurationOfGlorpDBX project version: '1.2') load: 'All with PostgreSQL native > Hi, I followed your instructions and I've been able to load GLORP on a Moose Nightly Built image [1]. I run the 844 tests. 839 of them passed (wow), 4 failed and 1 generated an error. These are the problematic ones: GlorpManyToManyDBTest>>#testReadNodeAndDeleteChildWithSaveAndContinue GlorpRowMapForMementosCollectionTest>>#testRBSmallDictionary GlorpDateTest>>#testDate GlorpObjectMappedToImaginaryTableTest>>#testReadBackEntireExample GlorpUnitOfWorkTest>>#testRollbackOneToManyAfterAdd Are these tests failing also on other Pharo images (i.e., they are known "problems")? Do you know the impact of these failures? will GLORP be reliable without them? Moose developers, would you include GLORP in the images built by hudson? I think 839 passing tests are good enough for the development image. Ciao, Alberto [1] http://hudson.moosetechnology.org/job/moose-with-glamour-seaside/ _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 2 sept. 2010, at 13:23, Alberto Bacchelli wrote:
I guess yes, it's pretty easy now to add a new build config in Hudson which would load Glorp with Moose. Which Pharo version are you using? 1.2 or 1.1? We don't have yet a working conf for Pharo 1.2 although it seems on its way. -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Alberto Bacchelli
On 9/2/10 1:42 PM, Simon Denier wrote:
> > On 2 sept. 2010, at 13:23, Alberto Bacchelli wrote: > > Moose developers, would you include > GLORP in the images built by hudson? > I think 839 passing tests are good enough for > the development image. > > I guess yes, it's pretty easy now to add a new build config in Hudson which would load Glorp with Moose. > > Which Pharo version are you using? 1.2 or 1.1? I think it's 1.1. It's the moose hudson nightly built image. _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 2 sept. 2010, at 13:49, Alberto Bacchelli wrote: > On 9/2/10 1:42 PM, Simon Denier wrote: >> >> On 2 sept. 2010, at 13:23, Alberto Bacchelli wrote: >> >> Moose developers, would you include >> GLORP in the images built by hudson? >> I think 839 passing tests are good enough for >> the development image. >> >> I guess yes, it's pretty easy now to add a new build config in Hudson which would load Glorp with Moose. >> >> Which Pharo version are you using? 1.2 or 1.1? > > I think it's 1.1. > It's the moose hudson nightly built image. OK, because I saw this line: (ConfigurationOfGlorpDBX project version: '1.2') load: 'All with PostgreSQL native -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Alberto Bacchelli
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Alberto Bacchelli <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes. And I don't know how to fix them. If anyone can help, excellent. Do you know the impact of these failures? No will GLORP be reliable without them? I really don't know, but I guess that yes.
I don't think this is a good idea. I think Glorp has nothing to do with Moose on most cases. This is one of the reasons of having a conf, that with one line of code you can load it...So it is not so complicated if you need to do it manually on a normal Moose image. I think 839 passing tests are good enough for _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
In reply to this post by Simon Denier-3
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Simon Denier <[hidden email]> wrote:
This has nothing to do with Pharo version. This is 1.2 version of GlorpDBX, not Pharo.
_______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
On 2 sept. 2010, at 14:05, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Oh, my mistake, in my mind "1.2" refers to Pharo 1.2 -- Simon _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |