> Hi Stef,
> just one thing troubles me: there are two working copies: files on disk and
> the image by itself.
Yes :)
> What are the possible modes of operation?
> - operate exclusively from Pharo IDE - and that will take care of allways
> synching the two copies (user never have to care of the one on disk)
This is what you do when you load or merge code.
> - operate exlcusively from Pharo IDE and interact with low level git API to
> completely avoid the working copy on disk (the next step)
I do not think that you can.
> - operate either from Pharo IDE or any other git client (including command
> line) and manage to sync the two working copies
>
> 2017-11-01 1:38 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <
[hidden email]>:
>>
>> Thanks Stef. They will be very useful.
>> I presume the simpler one is for projects you own, and the other is
>> contributing to third-party projects. It would be good to be explicit by
>> adding such a title to distinguish them.
>>
>> If your software allows, it might be enhanced by:
>> * adding sequence numbers
>> * draw a line to text like "clone" to a bitmap of the matching Pharo menu
>> item
>>
>> cheers -ben
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Stephane Ducasse
>> <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> during the last sprint we were brainstorming how we can help people to
>>> understand the git hub setup.
>>> I produced these two diagrams with christophe.
>>>
>>> Are they useful for you?
>>>
>>> Stef
>>
>>
>