Re: "Real" packages.

>
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, David Röthlisberger <[hidden email]
> > wrote:
>
>
> So if we had real packages in Pharo as first class entities, OB  
> would be much faster
> and simpler to maintain. Right now, OB models packages and class  
> cats itself, has to
> take the information from both the Monticello's working copy  
> managers and the
> SystemOrganizer. This is a mess and a huge pain, but what can we do.
> We should really invest in bringing real packages to Pharo.
>
>
> If you want "real" packages, I've implemented them in Squeak:
>
> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Namespaces
> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Packages
>
> The places the code is held, including a video and a Squeak image is  
> linked from here:
> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/SecureSqueak
>
> I'm not interested in Pharo, but the code is there and is released  
> under the MIT license if anybody else wants it.
>
> Gulik.
>
> --
> http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project