Hi Dale. I didn't test it, but from the theorical point of view, I really like it. I hope other people too. I think we have to take advantage of Metacello features to do this kind of stuff.
It is very interesting to have two groups: one for the core (and probably deployment) and one for development. If you do this changes, please update the workspace of ConfigurationOfSeaside explaining this :) (sorry if you already did it) Cheers mariano On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email]> wrote: I am looking for a little feedback on the changes that I have made to the latest configurations of Seaside30, Magritte2, and Pier2. I have new versions for each of these configurations queued up for release (#development blessing), but before releasing them I'd like to hear if the changes I've made will cause trouble for folks using Magritte2 and/or Pier2 in their applications. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Mariano,
Yes that's what I was thinking. I plan on updating the Seaside config and workspace ... but I wanted to make sure I wasn't headed off in some wild direction first:) I think that the minimum is to have a deployment group that loads just what is needed ... Development becomes a stickier issue, because it isn't always clear what should be included ... I think that with Metacello, one can be very explicit about what pieces one wants to load...it would be nice to have a minimal development group that adds just what is needed to do development (i.e., trying to debug a sticky production problem you'd like to load only what you need and getting examples and a bunch of other stuff isn't something you'd want to load into a production environment ... ). I think that one can leverage groups in Metacello which means that in an application one can afford to use _more_ mcz files...providing fine granularity on what can be loaded (even down to the level of a class per mcz file for things like independent components)...I wouldn't think that everything should be reduced to that fine of a granularity...but there are advantages to breaking things up into smaller loadable chunks... Dale Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > Hi Dale. I didn't test it, but from the theorical point of view, I > really like it. I hope other people too. I think we have to take > advantage of Metacello features to do this kind of stuff. > > It is very interesting to have two groups: one for the core (and > probably deployment) and one for development. > > If you do this changes, please update the workspace of > ConfigurationOfSeaside explaining this :) > (sorry if you already did it) > > Cheers > > mariano > > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Dale Henrichs <[hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > > I am looking for a little feedback on the changes that I have made > to the latest configurations of Seaside30, Magritte2, and Pier2. I > have new versions for each of these configurations queued up for > release (#development blessing), but before releasing them I'd like > to hear if the changes I've made will cause trouble for folks using > Magritte2 and/or Pier2 in their applications. > > In the past, when you referenced Seaside30 from a configuration, the > entire Seaside3.0 release would be loaded, including development > tools, examples, both adaptors (on Squeak/Pharo and > GemStone)...basically the whole kitchen sink. > > With the 3.0.0-alpha5.15 release I've defined several groups for > Seaside3.0 (with feedback from the Seaside devs:): Base, Base Tests, > Development and Development Tests. I will also add a One-click group > to shdow the one-click release. Without going into too much detail, > the Base group defines the set of packages that are needed for a > production release, while the Development group defines the set of > packages that are useful in development (on top of the Base). > > To see how these new groups work out, I have created new versions of > the configurations for Magritte2 and Pier2 that reference the Base > group (plus any other packages that were needed) instead of bringing > in the entire Seaside3.0 release...This is the big change. After > loading the Magritte2 or Pier2 configuration you will need to load > from the Seaside30 configuration any and all packages that you may > need for your own application. > > I haven't released the changes yet, but if you are curious or > concerned you can try out the releases ahead of time ... depending > upon feedback I may go with a different scheme. > > In a fresh image, you can see what will be loaded for production by > executing one or more of the following expressions (note you need to > get the latest version of each of the configs from the SqueakSource > MetacelloRepository...oh and for best results use Metacello > 1.0-beta.27.1): > > (ConfigurationOfMagritte2 project version: '2.0.5') load. > (ConfigurationOfPier2 project version: '2.0.6') load. > (ConfigurationOfPierAddOns2 project version: '2.0.6') load. > > Once you've loaded one of these configs, there will be no > development tools nor any adaptors so at a minimum you'll need to > load one of the following depending upon which adaptor you want to use: > > "All platforms" > (ConfigurationOfSeaside30 project version: '3.0.0-alpha5.15') > load: #('Seaside-Adaptors-Swazoo'). > "Squeak and Pharo" > (ConfigurationOfSeaside30 project version: '3.0.0-alpha5.15') > load: #('Seaside-Adaptors-Comanche'). > "GemStone" > (ConfigurationOfSeaside30 project version: '3.0.0-alpha5.15') > load: #('Seaside-Adaptors-FastCGI'). > > If you want to load in the Seaside development environment then you > would evaluate the following expression: > > (ConfigurationOfSeaside30 project version: '3.0.0-alpha5.15') > load: #('Development'). > > So at this point you can see the direction I'm going with this ... > the Magritte2 and Pier2 configurations are currently aimed at > loading the bare minimum needed for functionality from Seaside3.0 > for Magritte2 and Pier2 with the idea that you'd load the additional > functionality that you want by dealing directly with Seaside30 > configuration (like loading adaptors and development)... > > Pier2 already depends upon the following javascript packages: > > 'Javascript-Core' 'Prototype-Core' 'Scriptaculous-Core' 'JQuery-UI' > > but if you're currently using Magritte2 and javascript, then you'll > need to explicitly load the javascript package(s) that you are using. > > There are other ways that the configs could be structured. This > approach minimizes the coupling between the Seaside3.0 and > Magritte2/Pier2 configurations, which I think is a good thing. > > I've taken the bare minimum step: loading what is required... it > would be reasonable to add 'Dev' groups to both Magritte2 and Pier2 > that would bring in Seaside30 dev support on the other hand, I don't > think it is reasonable to add support for loading the various > Adaptors to Magritte2 and Pier2, so if you're going to have to deal > with the Seaside30 config directly anyway why bother with adding dev > groups ... > > Anyway this is what _I_ think and I am interested in what you folks > think... > > For GemStone folks ... the answer is yes, Magritte2 and Pier2 have > been ported to GemStone/S 64 2.4 finally:). If you've been working > with Seaside3.0 already, you can load the > Magritte2/Pier2/PierAddOns2 configs into a fresh > 1.0-beta.8....otherwise I'll ask you to wait until I announcement. > > Dale > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > [hidden email] > <mailto:[hidden email]> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |