Re: Small DLLCC Enhancement and questions.

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Small DLLCC Enhancement and questions.

Martin McClure
Antony Blakey wrote:
>
> My questions are: 1) is it worth releasing this given Cincom is redoing
> DLLCC i.e. does anyone want it?;

It sounds quite nice; I'd use it. I haven't followed the details of what
Cincom is planning to do to DLLCC, but if it doesn't already include
something like this, I'd like to see it include this.

Regards,

-Martin

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Small DLLCC Enhancement and questions.

Mike Hales
I'm interested in your Erlang interface.  I have recently been looking into that also.  Do you have an interface for the erl_interface libraries, work through stdin and stdout, or sockets?  If erl_interface, do you end up compiling the c code as shared libraries?  The makefiles in the erlang source build just static libraries (at least on Linux).  I've been planning on building an all Smalltalk interface similar to the Jinterface libraries for Java/Erlang.  Any details on your work here or available code would be appreciated.

Mike

On Sep 11, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Antony Blakey wrote:

and the Erlang library, which I'm going to use both to manage image farms using Erlang and to use Erlang from ST for e.g. distributed events and logging.