Re: The Inbox: Monticello-bp.413.mcz

> A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox:
> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-bp.413.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: Monticello-bp.413
> Author: bp
> Time: 14 December 2010, 8:00:35.712 am
> UUID: fdcd0906-5c39-4653-80e2-e71ee1c117a4
> Ancestors: Monticello-bp.412
>
> - added cleanUp: to flushObsoletePackageInfos (only when doing an aggressive cleanUp)
>
> =============== Diff against Monticello-bp.412 ===============
>
> Item was added:
> + ----- Method: MCPackageManager class>>cleanUp: (in category 'class initialization') -----
> + cleanUp: aggressive
> + "Remove all PackageInfos that are not associated with an MCPackageManager when aggressively cleaning up"
> +
> + aggressive ifTrue: [self flushObsoletePackageInfos]!
>
>

> Dear core developers,
>
> Are there any reasons not to add Monticello-bp.413.mcz to the trunk?
>
> I would like to make sure that in the new Squeak 4.2 trunk image there are no obsolete PackageInfos. Do PackageList open and compare it with the packages in the Monticello Browser. There are packages like BabySRE, Morphic-CandidatesForGo, Morphic-TrueType which seem to be leftovers from the past.
>
> There were several threads about this:
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-December/155778.html
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-November/154868.html
>
> Cheers,
> Bernhard
>
> Am 14.12.2010 um 07:00 schrieb [hidden email]:
>
>> A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox:
>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-bp.413.mcz
>>
>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>
>> Name: Monticello-bp.413
>> Author: bp
>> Time: 14 December 2010, 8:00:35.712 am
>> UUID: fdcd0906-5c39-4653-80e2-e71ee1c117a4
>> Ancestors: Monticello-bp.412
>>
>> - added cleanUp: to flushObsoletePackageInfos (only when doing an aggressive cleanUp)
>>
>> =============== Diff against Monticello-bp.412 ===============
>>
>> Item was added:
>> + ----- Method: MCPackageManager class>>cleanUp: (in category 'class initialization') -----
>> + cleanUp: aggressive
>> + "Remove all PackageInfos that are not associated with an MCPackageManager when aggressively cleaning up"
>> +
>> + aggressive ifTrue: [self flushObsoletePackageInfos]!
>>
>>
>
>
>

> Done. Thanks for the reminder.
>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
> On 12/23/2010 10:12 AM, Bernhard Pieber wrote:
>> Dear core developers,
>>
>> Are there any reasons not to add Monticello-bp.413.mcz to the trunk?
>>
>> I would like to make sure that in the new Squeak 4.2 trunk image there are no obsolete PackageInfos. Do PackageList open and compare it with the packages in the Monticello Browser. There are packages like BabySRE, Morphic-CandidatesForGo, Morphic-TrueType which seem to be leftovers from the past.
>>
>> There were several threads about this:
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-December/155778.html
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2010-November/154868.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bernhard
>>
>> Am 14.12.2010 um 07:00 schrieb [hidden email]:
>>
>>> A new version of Monticello was added to project The Inbox:
>>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Monticello-bp.413.mcz
>>>
>>> ==================== Summary ====================
>>>
>>> Name: Monticello-bp.413
>>> Author: bp
>>> Time: 14 December 2010, 8:00:35.712 am
>>> UUID: fdcd0906-5c39-4653-80e2-e71ee1c117a4
>>> Ancestors: Monticello-bp.412
>>>
>>> - added cleanUp: to flushObsoletePackageInfos (only when doing an aggressive cleanUp)
>>>
>>> =============== Diff against Monticello-bp.412 ===============
>>>
>>> Item was added:
>>> + ----- Method: MCPackageManager class>>cleanUp: (in category 'class initialization') -----
>>> + cleanUp: aggressive
>>> + "Remove all PackageInfos that are not associated with an MCPackageManager when aggressively cleaning up"
>>> +
>>> + aggressive ifTrue: [self flushObsoletePackageInfos]!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>