Rotation in VW through: Image>>rotatedByDegrees: degrees
>>rotateByDegrees: degrees to: newImage interpolate: interpolate
rotates the image within the same image bounds.. in the first case.. and rotates anticlockwise.. whereas the norm seems to be..
a full image that is larger ( or smaller ... ) because of the tilt with the background pixel being configurable..
The rotation that is clockwise for positive degrees..
Or am I reaching up for wrong interpretation here...
Finally the performance leaves much to be desired for large images.. should we not have a VW engine function that performs the bulk of image bits copy..kind of move the second method nearly all to a primitive call...